Re: MARC structure (Was: Re: Ceci n'est pas un catalogue)

From: Sharon Foster <fostersm1_at_nyob>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 11:50:58 -0400
To: NGC4LIB_at_listserv.nd.edu
But even there, the content requirements will differ among various
institutions and types of libraries. Then there are the administrative
constraints/requirements, such as cost, schedule, and staffing, which
surely will differ. It seems to me that what's needed is leadership
from an organization that can actually *do* something. OCLC? Library
of Congress?

On 8/29/07, Bernhard Eversberg <ev_at_biblio.tu-bs.de> wrote:
>
> Talking about NGC, what matters most is the _content_ of the
> data, not the structure. Time and again, this discussion drifts off
> into heated but pointless debates on formats and data structure.
> Meager content cannot be upgraded by any amount of formatting
> or representation. Inconsistent content (the biggest issue) will yield
> unsatisfactory retrieval results no matter how these are presented or
> coded.
Received on Wed Aug 29 2007 - 11:50:58 EDT