Re: Re: Aristotle, "Everything is Miscellaneous", and the lib's "educative function" [was: Prof. Burke's wish list]

From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle_at_nyob>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 08:44:43 -0700
To: NGC4LIB_at_listserv.nd.edu
Dan Lester wrote:

> Ahhh, yes.  But if you think Dewey is bad, take a look at LC.  Even though not shoehorned into tens, it has the same issue of lack of room for expansion, for insertion of materials on new topics, and so forth.  That will necessarily be true of ANY system that classifies.
Well, I can't prove this, but Ranganathan, who was a mathematician, claimed that his colon classification was infinitely expandable due to his use of the number 9 to extend the notation at any point.

--
-----------------------------------
Karen Coyle / Digital Library Consultant
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://www.kcoyle.net
ph.: 510-540-7596   skype: kcoylenet
fx.: 510-848-3913
mo.: 510-435-8234
------------------------------------
Received on Tue Jun 05 2007 - 09:31:23 EDT