Ross Singer wrote:
> On 5/16/07, Bernhard Eversberg <ev_at_biblio.tu-bs.de> wrote:
>> Dan Mullineux wrote:
>> > Explanatory references - shouts RDF.
>> >
>> Not really.
>>
> Why do you say this? Some explanation of why RDF wouldn't be up for
> the task would be helpful, rather than curt dismissal.
>
> Personally, I think everything that's being discussed on this list,
> linking discrete data, shouts RDF.
>
RDF is old enough meanwhile to have inspired and informed some
interesting new and real developments on not too small a scale.
If so, where are they and what has been learned?
If not, why not?
B.Eversberg.
Received on Mon May 21 2007 - 01:46:18 EDT