Re: Spiderable OPACs and the elephant in the library lobby

From: K.G. Schneider <kgs_at_nyob>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:47:06 -0400
To: NGC4LIB_at_listserv.nd.edu
> |Which has to have an identifier. Or some identifiers. And needs to
> |know its relationship to other bibliographic records (editions,
> |reprintings). ...
> |Hmmm. It sounds so simple, doesn't it?
>
> Sounds like OCLC WorldCat to me...
>
> Harvey

I wonder how many of us are conceptually on board with the concept of a
national catalog, and yet hesitate to endorse this concept (or even argue
for a functional model we realize is not working for us now, if it ever did)
because the only functional model remotely available to us (and not that
remote any more, either) would place us under the control of the Big O.

Karen G. Schneider
kgs_at_bluehighways.com
Received on Tue Apr 24 2007 - 10:43:48 EDT