At 07:43 AM 03/20/2007, Candy Schwartz wrote:
>. . . . . .
>Also, I worry in all of this that we need to make a distinction
>between usability and performance. It's one thing to ask whether
>a presentation method makes the process of navigation easier,
>makes people happier, and makes them feel in more control, and
>it's another to ask whether they are getting the right/relevant
>information (however we define "right/relevant") in a timely
>manner.
This is an important observation, and it raises the issue of
standards for indexing, searching and retrieval. If you examine what
really goes on when a search retrieves a record, it quickly becomes
clear that inconsistencies among databases--in terms of the fields
present in the record, how the data in those fields is defined, the
taxonomy rules (or lack thereof) governing name and subject fields,
and what fields are put in what indexes--as well as inconsistencies
in how the search input is treated by each server, makes getting the
right/relevant information problematical at best.
I suspect that one reason the value of IR standards such as
Z39.50/SRW/SRU, CCL, name and subject authority control and indexing
guidelines have not been appreciated and implemented more is that
most people are content to live with a lot of "noise" as long as a
few relevant records show up near the top of the results.
But the fact remains that, given the level of technology that really
works, there is still no substitute for standards in creating search
and retrieval systems that get the right/relevant material in a timely fashion.
So let's not abandon the standards the library community has worked
so hard to achieve unless it is demonstrated that they are no longer
needed. I have seen no evidence that clever linguistic heuristics,
user interfaces and post result processing can adequately substitute
for the lack of traditional standards.
David
>Candy
>----------
>Candy Schwartz, Professor
>GLSIS, Simmons College, Boston, Mass.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Next generation catalogs for libraries
> > [mailto:NGC4LIB_at_listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of Automatic
> > digest processor
> > Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 11:07 PM
> > To: Recipients of NGC4LIB digests
> > Subject: NGC4LIB Digest - 18 Mar 2007 to 19 Mar 2007 (#2007-58)
> >
> > There are 19 messages totalling 1606 lines in this issue.
> >
> > Topics of the day:
> >
> > 1. what is in this "next generation" library catalog thing?
>(10)
> > 2. working group on the future of bibliographic control (2)
> > 3. Workshop announcement - Metadata Standards and
> > Applications, April 25-26,
> > Davis, CA
> > 4. Patents on faceted navigation: what's the impact? (6)
> >
> >
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>-----
> >
> > Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 09:55:20 -0400
> > From: Jonathan Rochkind <rochkind_at_JHU.EDU>
> > Subject: Re: what is in this "next generation" library catalog
>thing?
> >
> > Karen Coyle wrote:
> > > Tom Keays wrote:
> > >> Bad form. Following up on my own post. I also wonder why
>Google
> > >> doesn't expose Google Books content in their general search
>engine
> > >> results?
> > > The main reason, which came up at the LC meeting at Google
> > last week, is
> > > that they don't have a way yet to rank the books.
> > Ha! See, we can't just "go what Google does". Even Google
>hasn't yet
> > figured out a way to "do what Google does" with books.
> >
> > I know that most people on this list know this, but one of my
> > continual
> > frustrations is people in the library world that think "Gee, we
>just
> > need to do what Google does." As if there aren't any hard
> > problems left
> > to solve, Google has solved them all. Google is just this
> > business, man!
> >
> > But this anecdote will certainly be what I bring up next time
> > I have to
> > deal with someone from the "Do we have to worry about any of
> > this stuff
> > anymore? Can't we just let Google do it all" school..
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> > > And even if they
> > > figure out how to rank the books, how will they interleave
> > the ranked
> > > books and the ranked web pages? What is the relative rank
> > between the
> > > book ranked #1 and the article ranked #1 if the ranking
>criteria are
> > > different? And they will be different, as Dan Clancy said at
>the
> > > meeting, because, as he explains it, the web is already
> > organized and
> > > "ranked" through user-provided links. There is no
> > user-provided ranking
> > > in a set of books.
> > >
> > > A key thing to remember is that Google is not so much a
> > search engine as
> > > it is a ranking engine. Searching is the easy part, and
> > lots of other
> > > systems also do it. It's the ranking that makes Google
>useful.
> > >
> > > kc
> > >
> > > --
> > > -----------------------------------
> > > Karen Coyle / Digital Library Consultant
> > > kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://www.kcoyle.net
> > > ph.: 510-540-7596
> > > fx.: 510-848-3913
> > > mo.: 510-435-8234
> > > ------------------------------------
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Jonathan Rochkind
> > Sr. Programmer/Analyst
> > The Sheridan Libraries
> > Johns Hopkins University
> > 410.516.8886
> > rochkind (at) jhu.edu
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 10:32:15 -0400
> > From: Eric Lease Morgan <emorgan_at_ND.EDU>
> > Subject: Re: what is in this "next generation" library catalog
>thing?
> >
> > Despite some of the following comments, I still believe we need
>to
> > think harder about collections when it comes to this "'next
> > generation' library thing":
> >
> > * Why "collect"? Don't you mean "provide access to" or
> > "provide records that link to"? --Dan Lester
> >
> > * To me the question is not "what's in it?" but "what does
>it
> > connect to?" and "what are it's services?" --Karen Coyle
> >
> > * And I got: I want to help people build their own personal
> > branch of the One Big Library, and to help them build
>their own
> > customized catalogue to that branch. --William Denton
> >
> > IMHO, collections without services are useless, and services
>without
> > collections are empty. A library needs both collections AND
>services
> > in order to practice librarianship.
> >
> > One part of librarianship is collection and preservation.
>Copying
> > things locally is not necessary for providing services against
>an
> > index (catalog), but creating local collections, whether they
>be
> > analog or digital, does offer two additional opportunities: 1)
>it
> > allows you to archive/preserve the materials, and 2) it
>provides a
> > way to index and display content in ways better meeting the
>needs of
> > your clientele. Put other ways, "Lot's of copies keep stuff
>safe",
> > and "I don't need your stinkin' interface, just give me the
>data."
> >
> > A few years ago there was an Internet mantra, "Content is
>king."
> > These days it seem to be more like, "Context is king", but I
>believe
> > it is really a combination of the two. Content and context.
> > Collections and services. Great libraries will provide both.
> >
> > --
> > Eric Lease Morgan
> > University Libraries of Notre Dame
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:09:14 -0400
> > From: Tom Keays <tomkeays_at_GMAIL.COM>
> > Subject: Re: what is in this "next generation" library catalog
>thing?
> >
> > OK. But consider this. When I searched "Vernor Vinge rainbow's
>end" in
> > Google, a single sponsored link for the book listing at Amazon
> > appeared.
> >
> > Anyway, regardless of ranking schemes, Google has "keyed
>searches"
> > (searches that partition the results by type) -- i.e., the same
>search
> > can give results specific for images, books, articles (Google
> > Scholar), blogs, etc. (I suppose we would call these faceted
>searches
> > these days except they push you into separate interfaces.)
> >
> > If those keys were more obvious in the interface, the sort of
>thing we
> > are talking about would be possible. As it is, Google provides
> >
> > Web
> > Images
> > Video
> > News
> > Maps
> > more >
> >
> > in their simple interface, so getting to other results is not
>obvious.
> > The more > tab pushes a DOM popup with further options
> >
> > Blogs
> > Books
> > Froogle
> > Groups
> > Patents
> > Scholar
> > even more >
> >
> > Google periodically changes things around. I recall that
>Froogle was
> > in the main page previously and neither Books nor Scholar were
>on the
> > more > popup.
> >
> > Tom
> >
> > On 3/18/07, Karen Coyle <kcoyle_at_kcoyle.net> wrote:
> > > Tom Keays wrote:
> > > > Bad form. Following up on my own post. I also wonder why
>Google
> > > > doesn't expose Google Books content in their general search
>engine
> > > > results?
> > > The main reason, which came up at the LC meeting at Google
> > last week, is
> > > that they don't have a way yet to rank the books. And even if
>they
> > > figure out how to rank the books, how will they interleave
> > the ranked
> > > books and the ranked web pages?
> >
> > --
> > Tom
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:26:52 -0400
> > From: Eric Lease Morgan <emorgan_at_ND.EDU>
> > Subject: working group on the future of bibliographic control
> >
> > working_group_on_the_future_of_bibliographic_control++ for
>beginning
> > a nation-wide process of evaluating metadata and its uses. See:
> >
> > http://www.loc.gov/bibliographic-future/
> >
> > working_group_on_the_future_of_bibliographic_control-- for not
> > allowing the site to support feedback/comments.
> >
> > --
> > Eric Lease Morgan
> > University Libraries of Notre Dame
> >
> > (574) 631-8604
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:34:03 -0400
> > From: Jonathan Rochkind <rochkind_at_JHU.EDU>
> > Subject: Re: what is in this "next generation" library catalog
>thing?
> >
> > Part of 'collections' is the _choosing_ what to
>include---whether it's
> > hosted locally or remotely. That is probably the important
> > part---whether it should be hosted locally or remotely is a
> > question of
> > what service we want to provide, and whether that service CAN
> > be hosted
> > remotely at the level we want, or whether it needs to be
> > hosted locally.
> > And what the costs associated with both are. For both digital
>OR
> > physical items! Many of our libraries even host physical
> > items off site.
> > Of course, hosting digital items off site is generally more
>feasible,
> > with less drop of service quality to the patron. But as Eric
>says,
> > hosting digital content locally may let you offer better
>quality
> > service. And there's also the issue of preservation---but
> > libraries are
> > now exploring even preservations off-site and consortial, for
>both
> > physical and digital. (What's the company/consortium that
>acquires
> > perpetual archiving rights to digital materials so your library
>can
> > subscribe to it, instead of worrying about it themselves?).
> >
> > In the present and future, our collections will be
> > multi-levelled. We'll
> > have some things on site. We'll have some things off site.
>We'll have
> > some things provided by vendors, and some things provided by
> > consortial
> > arrangements. We'll have some things that we "curate", and some
>things
> > that we help the users find out in the big wide Information
>Universe
> > that we didn't choose at all.
> >
> > There's a really good article on "what is a collection" in the
>digital
> > age, that's like 10 years old already but still good--but now I
>can't
> > remember enough about the citation to find the article!
> > (How's that for
> > a reference question). If I could remember it, I'd reccommend
>it.
> > Despite being 10 years old, it's about the exact same
>convesrsation we
> > are having now---to me indicating how SHORT a distance our
>profession
> > has gone in the past 10 years. We are not dealing with what we
>need to
> > be dealing with.
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> > Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
> > > Despite some of the following comments, I still believe we
>need to
> > > think harder about collections when it comes to this "'next
> > > generation' library thing":
> > >
> > > * Why "collect"? Don't you mean "provide access to" or
> > > "provide records that link to"? --Dan Lester
> > >
> > > * To me the question is not "what's in it?" but "what does
>it
> > > connect to?" and "what are it's services?" --Karen Coyle
> > >
> > > * And I got: I want to help people build their own personal
> > > branch of the One Big Library, and to help them build
>their own
> > > customized catalogue to that branch. --William Denton
> > >
> > > IMHO, collections without services are useless, and services
>without
> > > collections are empty. A library needs both collections AND
>services
> > > in order to practice librarianship.
> > >
> > > One part of librarianship is collection and preservation.
>Copying
> > > things locally is not necessary for providing services
>against an
> > > index (catalog), but creating local collections, whether they
>be
> > > analog or digital, does offer two additional opportunities:
>1) it
> > > allows you to archive/preserve the materials, and 2) it
>provides a
> > > way to index and display content in ways better meeting the
>needs of
> > > your clientele. Put other ways, "Lot's of copies keep stuff
>safe",
> > > and "I don't need your stinkin' interface, just give me the
>data."
> > >
> > > A few years ago there was an Internet mantra, "Content is
>king."
> > > These days it seem to be more like, "Context is king", but I
>believe
> > > it is really a combination of the two. Content and context.
> > > Collections and services. Great libraries will provide both.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Eric Lease Morgan
> > > University Libraries of Notre Dame
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Jonathan Rochkind
> > Sr. Programmer/Analyst
> > The Sheridan Libraries
> > Johns Hopkins University
> > 410.516.8886
> > rochkind (at) jhu.edu
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 10:36:35 -0500
> > From: "Andrews, Mark J." <MarkAndrews_at_CREIGHTON.EDU>
> > Subject: Re: working group on the future of bibliographic
>control
> >
> > Perhaps we need a shadow "Working Group on the Future of
>Bibliographic
> > Control" so everyone outside LC can decide what we're doing -
>with
> > feedback and comments at their site?
> >
> > Mark Andrews, Creighton University
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Next generation catalogs for libraries
> > [mailto:NGC4LIB_at_listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of Eric Lease Morgan
> > Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 10:27 AM
> > To: NGC4LIB_at_listserv.nd.edu
> > Subject: [NGC4LIB] working group on the future of
> > bibliographic control
> >
> > working_group_on_the_future_of_bibliographic_control++ for
>beginning
> > a nation-wide process of evaluating metadata and its uses. See:
> >
> > http://www.loc.gov/bibliographic-future/
> >
> > working_group_on_the_future_of_bibliographic_control-- for not
> > allowing the site to support feedback/comments.
> >
> > --
> > Eric Lease Morgan
> > University Libraries of Notre Dame
> >
> > (574) 631-8604
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:49:17 -0400
> > From: Jonathan Rochkind <rochkind_at_JHU.EDU>
> > Subject: Re: what is in this "next generation" library catalog
>thing?
> >
> > Ha! I found the citation I was thinking of. (Apparently I have
>some
> > reference skills after all).
> >
> > Lee, H-L (2000) What is a collection?. Journal of the
> > American Society for
> > Information Science; 51 (12) Oct 2000, p.1106-13
> >
> > "Examines 4 presumptions associated with library collections:
> > tangibility, ownership, */a/* user community and an
> > integrated retrieval
> > mechanism. Some of these presumptions have served only to
>perpetuate
> > misconceptions of */collection/*. Others seem to have become
>more
> > relevant in the current information environment. The emergence
>of
> > non-traditional media, such as the World Wide Web, poses 2
>specific
> > challenges: to question the necessity of finite collections
> > and contest
> > the boundaries of */a collection/*. */A/* critical analysis of
>these
> > issues results in */a/* proposal for an expanded concept of
> > */collection/* that considers the perspectives of both the
> > user and the
> > */collection/* developer, invites rigorous user-centred
>research and
> > looks at the */collection/* as an information-seeking
> > context. (Original
> > abstract - amended)"
> >
> >
> > I highly reccommend this article. Here, I'll try to give you
> > a COinS even:
> > |<span class="Z3988"
> > title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004|&issn=0002-8231&volume=51&issue=12&
>spage=1106&epage=13&date=2000%2D10>
>&genre=article&aulast=Lee&auinit=H%2DL&title=Journal%20of%20th
> > e%20American%20Society%20for%20Information%20Science&atitle=Wh
>at%20is%20a%20collection%3F|"></span>
> >
> > (Yeah, yeah, that's a terrible not-to-spec COinS. Not sure
> > the best way
> > to easily generate one that is in this situation?)
> >
> > Another choice quote (what have we done to address this in the
>past 7
> > years?)
> >
> > "Unfortunately, the gaps in a library's OPAC cause a major
>hurdle for
> > users. They frustrate users by making part of the collection
> > inaccessible from the main entry point into the collection:
> > the OPAC. It
> > also burdens users by forcing them to switch among a number
> > of different
> > information retrieval systems (IRSs) to find all materials in a
> > library's collection. Although it is desirable from the user's
> > perspective to access all information items through an
>integrated IRS,
> > this is not the case at present in many American libraries. In
>system
> > design, information professionals - librarians in particular -
>need to
> > take this consideration seriously. In other words, an
>integrated
> > retrieval system should be an indispensable element of a
> > well-developed
> > collection."
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > "A tricky question is whether remote information resources are
>part of
> > the library collection, for they are not physically collocated
> > there - they may be distributed on separate servers and
> > accessible only
> > through an electronic network. In librarianship, there have
>been a few
> > examples that provide precedents of a collection without being
> > physically collocated. One of them is the concept of a national
> > collection.[Note 4
> > <http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/72514560/
>main.html,ftx_abs#NOTE4>]
> > Since 1988, Australian librarians have vigorously promoted
> > the formation
> > of a /Distributed National Collection/ (Waters, [1992
> > <http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/72514560/
>main.html,ftx_abs#BIB41>]).
> >
> >
> > It seems unhelpful to debate whether or not a group of
> > objects, tangible
> > and/or virtual, physically collocated or distributed, qualify
>to be a
> > collection on a purely ideological level. Collections are
> > developed for
> > the purpose of serving users' information needs. The conceptual
> > understanding of a collection must fulfill this practical
> > purpose. Thus,
> > how users perceive a collection during information seeking, how
> > developers do so during collection development, and how a
>concept of
> > collection can facilitate information seeking are more
>pertinent
> > considerations."
> >
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> > |
> >
> >
> > Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
> > > Part of 'collections' is the _choosing_ what to
> > include---whether it's
> > > hosted locally or remotely. That is probably the important
> > > part---whether it should be hosted locally or remotely is
> > a question
> > > of what service we want to provide, and whether that service
>CAN be
> > > hosted remotely at the level we want, or whether it needs
> > to be hosted
> > > locally. And what the costs associated with both are. For
> > both digital
> > > OR physical items! Many of our libraries even host
> > physical items off
> > > site. Of course, hosting digital items off site is generally
>more
> > > feasible, with less drop of service quality to the patron.
> > But as Eric
> > > says, hosting digital content locally may let you offer
> > better quality
> > > service. And there's also the issue of preservation---but
>libraries
> > > are now exploring even preservations off-site and
> > consortial, for both
> > > physical and digital. (What's the company/consortium that
>acquires
> > > perpetual archiving rights to digital materials so your
>library can
> > > subscribe to it, instead of worrying about it themselves?).
> > >
> > > In the present and future, our collections will be
>multi-levelled.
> > > We'll have some things on site. We'll have some things off
> > site. We'll
> > > have some things provided by vendors, and some things
>provided by
> > > consortial arrangements. We'll have some things that we
> > "curate", and
> > > some things that we help the users find out in the big wide
> > > Information Universe that we didn't choose at all.
> > >
> > > There's a really good article on "what is a collection" in
> > the digital
> > > age, that's like 10 years old already but still good--but
> > now I can't
> > > remember enough about the citation to find the article!
>(How's that
> > > for a reference question). If I could remember it, I'd
> > reccommend it.
> > > Despite being 10 years old, it's about the exact same
> > convesrsation we
> > > are having now---to me indicating how SHORT a distance our
> > profession
> > > has gone in the past 10 years. We are not dealing with
> > what we need to
> > > be dealing with.
> > >
> > > Jonathan
> > >
> > > Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
> > >> Despite some of the following comments, I still believe we
>need to
> > >> think harder about collections when it comes to this "'next
> > >> generation' library thing":
> > >>
> > >> * Why "collect"? Don't you mean "provide access to" or
> > >> "provide records that link to"? --Dan Lester
> > >>
> > >> * To me the question is not "what's in it?" but "what
>does it
> > >> connect to?" and "what are it's services?" --Karen
>Coyle
> > >>
> > >> * And I got: I want to help people build their own
>personal
> > >> branch of the One Big Library, and to help them build
> > their own
> > >> customized catalogue to that branch. --William Denton
> > >>
> > >> IMHO, collections without services are useless, and
> > services without
> > >> collections are empty. A library needs both collections
> > AND services
> > >> in order to practice librarianship.
> > >>
> > >> One part of librarianship is collection and preservation.
>Copying
> > >> things locally is not necessary for providing services
>against an
> > >> index (catalog), but creating local collections, whether
>they be
> > >> analog or digital, does offer two additional opportunities:
>1) it
> > >> allows you to archive/preserve the materials, and 2) it
>provides a
> > >> way to index and display content in ways better meeting
> > the needs of
> > >> your clientele. Put other ways, "Lot's of copies keep stuff
>safe",
> > >> and "I don't need your stinkin' interface, just give me the
>data."
> > >>
> > >> A few years ago there was an Internet mantra, "Content is
>king."
> > >> These days it seem to be more like, "Context is king",
> > but I believe
> > >> it is really a combination of the two. Content and context.
> > >> Collections and services. Great libraries will provide
>both.
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Eric Lease Morgan
> > >> University Libraries of Notre Dame
> > >>
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Jonathan Rochkind
> > Sr. Programmer/Analyst
> > The Sheridan Libraries
> > Johns Hopkins University
> > 410.516.8886
> > rochkind (at) jhu.edu
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 10:23:14 -0700
> > From: Julie Moore <julie.renee.moore_at_GMAIL.COM>
> > Subject: Workshop announcement - Metadata Standards and
> > Applications, April 25-26, Davis, CA
> >
> > ------=_Part_112664_19687209.1174324994729
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> > Content-Disposition: inline
> >
> > ** This message is being cross-posted. Apologies for
>duplication.**
> >
> > Dear Colleagues:
> >
> > The Access, Collections, and Technical Services Section of
> > the California
> > Library Association (CLA ACTSS) is sponsoring an ALCTS/LC
> > workshop "Metadata
> >
> > Standards and Applications" on April 25-26 in Davis,
>California.
> >
> > This two-day workshop is the second course in the series
> > "Cataloging for the
> > 21st Century." The goal of the course is to relate what
> > attendees already
> > know about library catalog metadata to digital library
> > metadata, thereby
> > preparing them to apply their current knowledge to new areas.
> > The course
> > explores the following topics:
> > . Introduction to digital libraries
> > . Metadata models
> > . Overview of metadata standards and applications
> > . Metadata interoperability and distribution
> > . Controlled vocabulary use in metadata
> > . Application profiles
> > . Quality considerations and monitoring metadata
> > developments
> >
> > This course is designed for practicing catalogers (with or
>without MLS
> > degrees) from all types of libraries, with a working
> > knowledge of MARC and
> > concepts of bibliographic control.
> >
> > Luiz Mendes (Electronic Resources Librarian) and Mary Woodley
> > (Collection
> > Development Coordinator), from California State University,
> > Northridge, will
> > be the instructors for the course.
> >
> > The workshop is limited to 25 people. Registration fee is
> > $150 (CLA members)
> > or $190 (non-CLA members). For more information and to
> > register for the
> > workshop, please visit the ACTSS website:
> > http://cla-net.org/aboutcla/actss.php/.
> >
> > Please note: ACTSS and Southern California Technical
> > Processes Group will
> > co-sponsor the same workshop in May, which will be held in
>Northridge,
> > California (check
> > http://library.csun.edu/sctpg/meta_appspring2007.html for
> > more information).
> >
> > Please let me know if you have any questions.
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > Xiaoli Li
> > President, ACTSS
> > University of California, Davis
> > Davis, CA
> > Phone: 530-752-6735
> > Email: xlli_at_ucdavis.edu
> >
> > --
> > Julie Renee Moore
> > Catalogue Librarian
> > California State University, Fresno
> > julie.renee.moore_at_gmail.com
> >
> > ------=_Part_112664_19687209.1174324994729
> > Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> > Content-Disposition: inline
> >
> > <div style="direction: ltr;"> ** This message is being
> > cross-posted. Apologies for duplication.**<br><br>Dear
> > Colleagues:<br><br>The Access, Collections, and Technical
> > Services Section of the California<br>Library Association
> > (CLA ACTSS) is sponsoring an ALCTS/LC workshop "Metadata
> > <br>Standards and Applications" on April 25-26 in Davis,
> > California.<br><br>This two-day workshop is the second course
> > in the series "Cataloging for the<br>21st Century."
> > The goal of the course is to relate what attendees already
> > <br>know about library catalog metadata to digital library
> > metadata, thereby<br>preparing them to apply their current
> > knowledge to new areas. The course<br>explores the following
> > topics:<br>. Introduction
> > to digital libraries
> > <br>. Metadata models<br>.
> > Overview of metadata
> > standards and applications<br>.
> > Metadata interoperability and distribution<br>.
> > Controlled vocabulary use in
> > metadata<br>. Application
>profiles
> > <br>. Quality
> > considerations and monitoring metadata
> > developments<br><br>This course is designed for practicing
> > catalogers (with or without MLS<br>degrees) from all types of
> > libraries, with a working knowledge of MARC and
> > <br>concepts of bibliographic control.<br><br>Luiz Mendes
> > (Electronic Resources Librarian) and Mary Woodley
> > (Collection<br>Development Coordinator), from California
> > State University, Northridge, will<br>be the instructors for
> > the course.
> > <br><br>The workshop is limited to 25 people. Registration
> > fee is $150 (CLA members)<br>or $190 (non-CLA members). For
> > more information and to register for the<br>workshop, please
> > visit the ACTSS website:<br><a
> > href="http://cla-net.org/aboutcla/actss.php/" target="_blank"
> > onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">
> >
> >
> > http://cla-net.org/aboutcla/actss.php/</a>.<br><br>Please
> > note: ACTSS and Southern California Technical Processes Group
> > will<br>co-sponsor the same workshop in May, which will be
> > held in Northridge,<br>California (check
> > <a
> > href="http://library.csun.edu/sctpg/meta_appspring2007.html"
> > target="_blank" onclick="return
> > top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">
> > http://library.csun.edu/sctpg/meta_appspring2007.html</a>
> > for<br>more information).<br><br>Please let me know if
> > you have any questions.<br><br>Thank you.<br></div>
> > <span><br><span name="st">Xiaoli</span> <span
> > name="st">Li</span><br>President, ACTSS<br>University of
> > California, Davis<br>Davis, CA<br>Phone:
> > 530-752-6735<br>Email: <a href="mailto:xlli_at_ucdavis.edu"
> > target="_blank" onclick="return
> > top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">
> >
> >
> > xlli_at_ucdavis.edu</a></span><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Julie
> > Renee Moore<br>Catalogue Librarian<br>California State
> > University, Fresno<br><a
> > href="mailto:julie.renee.moore_at_gmail.com" target="_blank"
> > onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">
> >
> > julie.renee.moore_at_gmail.com</a><br><br>
> >
> > ------=_Part_112664_19687209.1174324994729--
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:23:53 -0500
> > From: "Hahn, Harvey" <hhahn_at_AHML.INFO>
> > Subject: Re: what is in this "next generation" library catalog
>thing?
> >
> > Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
> > |Despite some of the following comments, I still believe we
>need to
> > |think harder about collections when it comes to this "'next
> > |generation' library thing":
> > |
> > | * Why "collect"? Don't you mean "provide access to" or
> > | "provide records that link to"? --Dan Lester
> > |
> > | * To me the question is not "what's in it?" but "what does
>it
> > | connect to?" and "what are it's services?" --Karen Coyle
> >
> > I think there's always a "collection" involved. The real
>question, I
> > think, is who owns it? Does the local library own all or
> > some of it, or
> > do one or more remote sites own part or all of it (e.g., the
>fully
> > digital library)? The "services" attitude is, I think,
>directly
> > influenced by the "rental" attitude of today's consumers.
> > For example,
> > I *own* my personal DVD collection; many/most other people
> > *rent* their
> > DVDs. Either way, you pay, and there is the ability to view
>the DVDs.
> > However, down the road, as "older" and less-used content is
> > removed from
> > the market, the renters can no longer view some DVDs that they
>used to
> > because they are no longer available; on the other hand, since
>I
> > personally own them, I *can* still view them. Thus, the
>renters "pay"
> > again in that access is no longer available to particular
> > content. This
> > is the part related to collections and services that I have not
>yet
> > heard here: there is increasing risk related to access as we
> > become more
> > and more dependent on online digital content. Conservation and
> > preservation of digital content for the future becomes
>virtually
> > impossible because the content is owned and controlled by
> > others (mostly
> > with commercial interests) and is governed by the DMCA. If
>content is
> > withdrawn or available only at exhorbitant costs, where do
>libraries
> > stand and what have we gained with an emphasis on electronic
>access,
> > which is tenuous at best because it is out of our control.
> > Anyway, just
> > some more food for thought...
> >
> > Harvey
> >
> > --
> > ===========================================
> > Harvey E. Hahn, Manager, Technical Services Department
> > Arlington Heights (Illinois) Memorial Library
> > 847/506-2644 - FX: 847/506-2650 - Email: hhahn(at)ahml(dot)info
> > OML & Scripts web pages: http://www.ahml.info/oml/
> > Personal web pages: http://users.anet.com/~packrat
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:04:16 -0600
> > From: Dan Lester <dan_at_RIVEROFDATA.COM>
> > Subject: Re: what is in this "next generation" library catalog
>thing?
> >
> > ---- Original message ----------------------------------------
> > From: "Eric Lease Morgan" <emorgan_at_ND.EDU>
> > To: NGC4LIB_at_listserv.nd.edu
> > Received: 3/19/2007 8:32:15 AM
> > Subject: Re: [NGC4LIB] what is in this "next generation"
> > library catalog thing?
> >
> > >IMHO, collections without services are useless, and
> > services without
> > >collections are empty. A library needs both collections
> > AND services
> > >in order to practice librarianship.
> >
> > I don't think anyone would disagree with you, but the
> > question was about the Next Generation CATALOG, not about
> > Next Generation SERVICES. Yes, the catalog is one of the
> > services, but certainly not the only one.
> >
> > >A few years ago there was an Internet mantra, "Content is
>king."
> > >These days it seem to be more like, "Context is king", but
> > I believe
> > >it is really a combination of the two. Content and context.
> > >Collections and services. Great libraries will provide both.
> >
> > Yes, they will.
> >
> >
> > Show Up, Suit Up, Shut Up, and Follow Directions
> > dan_at_riverofdata.com
> > Dan Lester, Boise, Idaho, USA
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:33:52 -0400
> > From: Andrew Nagy <andrew.nagy_at_VILLANOVA.EDU>
> > Subject: Re: Patents on faceted navigation: what's the impact?
> >
> > Danielle Plumer wrote:
> > > "Prior art" is the way to attack patents such as these, as
> > Nancy states.
> > >
> > > The Open Source Development Laboratories has an "Open
> > Source as Prior Art" site at http://osapa.org/. The goal is
> > to protect innovation by reviewing, and challenging as
> > necessary, "poor quality" patents that threaten the
> > development of new software tools.
> > >
> > I have been surfing around the Wayback Machine on archive.org
>to find
> > instances of Faceted searching, but have not found much. It's
>hard to
> > find a site on the wayback machine that has more than the
> > front page. I
> > have looked at dell.com, ebay.com, cnet.com and since I cannot
>use the
> > searching mechanism it's hard to find instances of faceted
>search
> > results, but even so I haven't found good instances of
> > faceted browsing
> > with results on the same screen. Before 2001 that is.
> >
> > Andrew
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:36:18 -0400
> > From: Shawn Carraway <carraways_at_MIDLANDSTECH.EDU>
> > Subject: Re: Patents on faceted navigation: what's the impact?
> >
> > Didn't Visivismo have faceted browsing? I remember folders
> > or something
> > similar.
> >
> > Shawn
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Next generation catalogs for libraries
> > > [mailto:NGC4LIB_at_listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of Andrew Nagy
> > > Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 3:34 PM
> > > To: NGC4LIB_at_listserv.nd.edu
> > > Subject: Re: [NGC4LIB] Patents on faceted navigation: what's
> > > the impact?
> > >
> > > Danielle Plumer wrote:
> > > > "Prior art" is the way to attack patents such as these, as
> > > Nancy states.
> > > >
> > > > The Open Source Development Laboratories has an "Open
> > > Source as Prior Art" site at http://osapa.org/. The goal is
> > > to protect innovation by reviewing, and challenging as
> > > necessary, "poor quality" patents that threaten the
> > > development of new software tools.
> > > >
> > > I have been surfing around the Wayback Machine on
> > archive.org to find
> > > instances of Faceted searching, but have not found much.
> > It's hard to
> > > find a site on the wayback machine that has more than the
> > > front page. I
> > > have looked at dell.com, ebay.com, cnet.com and since I
> > cannot use the
> > > searching mechanism it's hard to find instances of faceted
>search
> > > results, but even so I haven't found good instances of
> > > faceted browsing
> > > with results on the same screen. Before 2001 that is.
> > >
> > > Andrew
> > >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 16:00:59 -0400
> > From: "Kathleen M. Folger" <kfolger_at_UMICH.EDU>
> > Subject: Re: Patents on faceted navigation: what's the impact?
> >
> > Northern Lights used folders to organize the results of a
> > search at least
> > as far back as 2000.
> > http://web.archive.org/web/20000304104725/www.northernlight.co
> > m/docs/custom_folders.html
> >
> > -Kathleen
> >
> > On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Shawn Carraway wrote:
> >
> > > Didn't Visivismo have faceted browsing? I remember folders
> > or something
> > > similar.
> > >
> > > Shawn
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Next generation catalogs for libraries
> > >> [mailto:NGC4LIB_at_listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of Andrew Nagy
> > >> Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 3:34 PM
> > >> To: NGC4LIB_at_listserv.nd.edu
> > >> Subject: Re: [NGC4LIB] Patents on faceted navigation: what's
> > >> the impact?
> > >>
> > >> Danielle Plumer wrote:
> > >>> "Prior art" is the way to attack patents such as these, as
> > >> Nancy states.
> > >>>
> > >>> The Open Source Development Laboratories has an "Open
> > >> Source as Prior Art" site at http://osapa.org/. The goal is
> > >> to protect innovation by reviewing, and challenging as
> > >> necessary, "poor quality" patents that threaten the
> > >> development of new software tools.
> > >>>
> > >> I have been surfing around the Wayback Machine on
> > archive.org to find
> > >> instances of Faceted searching, but have not found much.
> > It's hard to
> > >> find a site on the wayback machine that has more than the
> > >> front page. I
> > >> have looked at dell.com, ebay.com, cnet.com and since I
> > cannot use the
> > >> searching mechanism it's hard to find instances of faceted
>search
> > >> results, but even so I haven't found good instances of
> > >> faceted browsing
> > >> with results on the same screen. Before 2001 that is.
> > >>
> > >> Andrew
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:36:22 -0700
> > From: Steve Watkins <Steve_Watkins_at_CSUMB.EDU>
> > Subject: Re: Patents on faceted navigation: what's the impact?
> >
> > This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> >
> > ----=_--0dcee6c6.0dcee622.c224a4c6
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> >
> > This may have already been mentioned on this list, but
> > Northern Light was=
> > a search engine that created folders that served as facets
> > as far back a=
> > s 1997/98. See
> > http://web.archive.org/web/19980206192654/http://www.north=
> > ernlight.com/ for an example.
> >
> > --Steve
> >
> > Steve Watkins
> > Coordinator of Technology Development
> > CSU Monterey Bay Library
> > steve_watkins_at_csumb.edu
> >
> > Next generation catalogs for libraries
> > <NGC4LIB_at_listserv.nd.edu> writes:
> > >Didn't Visivismo have faceted browsing? I remember folders
> > or something
> > >similar.
> > >
> > >Shawn
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Next generation catalogs for libraries
> > >> [mailto:NGC4LIB_at_listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of Andrew Nagy
> > >> Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 3:34 PM
> > >> To: NGC4LIB_at_listserv.nd.edu
> > >> Subject: Re: [NGC4LIB] Patents on faceted navigation: what's
> > >> the impact?
> > >>
> > >> Danielle Plumer wrote:
> > >> > "Prior art" is the way to attack patents such as these, as
> > >> Nancy states.
> > >> >
> > >> > The Open Source Development Laboratories has an "Open
> > >> Source as Prior Art" site at http://osapa.org/. The goal is
> > >> to protect innovation by reviewing, and challenging as
> > >> necessary, "poor quality" patents that threaten the
> > >> development of new software tools.
> > >> >
> > >> I have been surfing around the Wayback Machine on
> > archive.org to find
> > >> instances of Faceted searching, but have not found much.
> > It's hard to
> > >> find a site on the wayback machine that has more than the
> > >> front page. I
> > >> have looked at dell.com, ebay.com, cnet.com and since I
> > cannot use the
> > >> searching mechanism it's hard to find instances of faceted
>search
> > >> results, but even so I haven't found good instances of
> > >> faceted browsing
> > >> with results on the same screen. Before 2001 that is.
> > >>
> > >> Andrew
> > >>
> >
> >
> >
> > ----=_--0dcee6c6.0dcee622.c224a4c6
> > Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> >
> > <?xml version=3D=221.0=22 encoding=3D=22ISO-8859-1=22?>
> > <=21DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC =22-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0
>Transitional//EN=22>
> > <html>
> > <head>
> > <meta http-equiv=3D=22Content-Type=22 content=3D=22text/html;
> > charset=3DISO=
> > -8859-1=22 />
> > <title></title>
> > <style type=3D=22text/css=22>
> > <=21--
> > body=7Bmargin-left:10px;margin-right:10px;margin-top:10px;marg
>in-bottom:10p=
> > x;=7D
> > -->
> > </style>
> > </head>
> > <body marginleft=3D=2210=22 marginright=3D=2210=22
> > margintop=3D=2210=22 mar=
> > ginbottom=3D=2210=22>
> > <font face=3D=22Verdana=22 size=3D=22+0=22
> > color=3D=22=23000000=22 style=
> > =3D=22font-family:Verdana;font-size:10pt;color:=23000000;=22>T
>his may have =
> > already been mentioned on this list, but Northern Light was a
> > search engine=
> > that created folders that served as facets as far back as
> > 1997/98. See <a =
> > href=3D=22http://web.archive.org/web/19980206192654/http://www
>.northernligh=
> > t.com/=22
> >
>target=3D=22_blank=22>http://web.archive.org/web/19980206192654/h
>=
> > ttp://www.northernlight.com/</a> for an example.<br />
> > <br />
> > --Steve<br />
> > <br />
> > Steve Watkins<br />
> > Coordinator of Technology Development<br />
> > CSU Monterey Bay Library<br />
> > <a
> > href=3D=22mailto:steve_watkins=40csumb.edu=22>steve_watkins=40
>csumb.edu<=
> > /a><br />
> > <br />
> > </font><font face=3D=22Arial=22 size=3D=22+0=22
> > color=3D=22=23000000=22 sty=
> > le=3D=22font-family:Arial;font-size:10pt;color:=23000000;=22><
>b>Next genera=
> > tion catalogs for libraries <<a
> > href=3D=22mailto:NGC4LIB=40listserv.nd.e=
> > du=22>NGC4LIB=40listserv.nd.edu</a>> writes:<br />
> > </b></font><span
> > style=3D=22background-color:=23d0d0d0;=22><font face=3D=
> > =22Geneva=22 size=3D=22-1=22 color=3D=22=23000000=22
> > style=3D=22font-family=
> > :Geneva;font-size:9pt;color:=23000000;=22>Didn't Visivismo
> > have faceted bro=
> > wsing? I remember folders or something<br />
> > similar.<br />
> > <br />
> > Shawn<br />
> > <br />
> > > -----Original Message-----<br />
> > > From: Next generation catalogs for libraries<br />
> > > =5B<a href=3D=22mailto:NGC4LIB=40listserv.nd.edu=22
> > target=3D=22_blank=
> > =22>mailto:NGC4LIB=40listserv.nd.edu</a>=5D On Behalf Of
> > Andrew Nagy<br />
> > > Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 3:34 PM<br />
> > > To: <a
> >
>href=3D=22mailto:NGC4LIB=40listserv.nd.edu=22>NGC4LIB=40listser=
> > v.nd.edu</a><br />
> > > Subject: Re: =5BNGC4LIB=5D Patents on faceted
> > navigation: what's<br />
> > > the impact?<br />
> > ><br />
> > > Danielle Plumer wrote:<br />
> > > > "Prior art" is the way to attack patents
> > such as these,=
> > as<br />
> > > Nancy states.<br />
> > > ><br />
> > > > The Open Source Development Laboratories has an
> > "Open<br />
> > > Source as Prior Art" site at http://osapa.org/. The
> > goal is<br />
> > > to protect innovation by reviewing, and challenging as<br
>/>
> > > necessary, "poor quality" patents that
> > threaten the<br />
> > > development of new software tools.<br />
> > > ><br />
> > > I have been surfing around the Wayback Machine on
> > archive.org to find<=
> > br />
> > > instances of Faceted searching, but have not found much.
> > It's ha=
> > rd to<br />
> > > find a site on the wayback machine that has more than
>the<br />
> > > front page. I<br />
> > > have looked at dell.com, ebay.com, cnet.com and since I
> > cannot use the=
> > <br />
> > > searching mechanism it's hard to find instances of
> > faceted search<br /=
> > >
> > > results, but even so I haven't found good instances of<br
>/>
> > > faceted browsing<br />
> > > with results on the same screen. Before 2001 that
>is.<br />
> > ><br />
> > > Andrew<br />
> > ><br />
> > </font></span><font face=3D=22Verdana=22 size=3D=22+0=22
> > color=3D=22=230000=
> > 00=22
> >
>style=3D=22font-family:Verdana;font-size:10pt;color:=23000000;=22
> ><br=
> > />
> > </font>
> > </body>
> > </html>
> >
> > ----=_--0dcee6c6.0dcee622.c224a4c6--
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 17:08:41 -0500
> > From: "Hahn, Harvey" <hhahn_at_AHML.INFO>
> > Subject: Re: Patents on faceted navigation: what's the impact?
> >
> > This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> >
> > ------_=_NextPart_001_01C76A73.2761A066
> > Content-Type: text/plain;
> > charset="us-ascii"
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> >
> > The Northern Light "Custom Search Folders" patent (5,924,090)
>was
> > applied for on May 1, 1997 (which is why NL could claim
> > "patent pending"
> > when it opened to the public on August 5) and was granted on
>July 13,
> > 1999. (The inventor, by the way, was Marc F. Krellenstein of
>Chestnut
> > Hill, MA, with Northern Light Technology LLC of Cambridge,
> > MA, being the
> > assignee.)
> > =20
> > Additionally, from the prior message below, the name is spelled
> > "Vivisimo" and its Web search engine is now called "Clusty"
>(the
> > clustering search engine) at http://clusty.com/.
> > =20
> > All FWIW.
> > =20
> > Harvey
> > --=20
> > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
>D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
> > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=20
> > Harvey E. Hahn, Manager, Technical Services Department=20
> > Arlington Heights (Illinois) Memorial Library=20
> > 847/506-2644 - FX: 847/506-2650 - Email:
>hhahn(at)ahml(dot)info=20
> > OML & Scripts web pages: http://www.ahml.info/oml/=20
> > Personal web pages: http://users.anet.com/~packrat=20
> > =20
> > =20
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > From: Next generation catalogs for libraries
> > [mailto:NGC4LIB_at_listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of Steve Watkins
> > Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 3:36 PM
> > To: NGC4LIB_at_listserv.nd.edu
> > Subject: Re: [NGC4LIB] Patents on faceted navigation:
> > what's the
> > impact?
> > =09
> > =09
> > This may have already been mentioned on this list,
> > but Northern
> > Light was a search engine that created folders that served as
> > facets as
> > far back as 1997/98. See
> > http://web.archive.org/web/19980206192654/http://www.northernl
> > ight.com/
> > for an example.
> > =09
> > --Steve
> > =09
> > Steve Watkins
> > Coordinator of Technology Development
> > CSU Monterey Bay Library
> > steve_watkins_at_csumb.edu
> > =09
> > Next generation catalogs for libraries
> > <NGC4LIB_at_listserv.nd.edu>
> > writes:
> > Didn't Visivismo have faceted browsing? I remember
>folders or
> > something
> > similar.
> > =09
> > Shawn
> > =09
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Next generation catalogs for libraries
> > > [mailto:NGC4LIB_at_listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of Andrew
>Nagy
> > > Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 3:34 PM
> > > To: NGC4LIB_at_listserv.nd.edu
> > > Subject: Re: [NGC4LIB] Patents on faceted navigation:
>what's
> > > the impact?
> > >
> > > Danielle Plumer wrote:
> > > > "Prior art" is the way to attack patents such as
>these, as
> > > Nancy states.
> > > >
> > > > The Open Source Development Laboratories has an
>"Open
> > > Source as Prior Art" site at http://osapa.org/. The
>goal is
> > > to protect innovation by reviewing, and challenging
>as
> > > necessary, "poor quality" patents that threaten the
> > > development of new software tools.
> > > >
> > > I have been surfing around the Wayback Machine on
> > archive.org
> > to find
> > > instances of Faceted searching, but have not found
> > much. It's
> > hard to
> > > find a site on the wayback machine that has more than
>the
> > > front page. I
> > > have looked at dell.com, ebay.com, cnet.com and
> > since I cannot
> > use the
> > > searching mechanism it's hard to find instances of
>faceted
> > search
> > > results, but even so I haven't found good instances
>of
> > > faceted browsing
> > > with results on the same screen. Before 2001 that
>is.
> > >
> > > Andrew
> > >
> > =09
> > =09
> >
> >
> > ------_=_NextPart_001_01C76A73.2761A066
> > Content-Type: text/html;
> > charset="us-ascii"
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> >
> > <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
> > <HTML><HEAD><TITLE></TITLE>
> > <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
> > charset=3Dus-ascii">
> > <STYLE type=3Dtext/css>
> > <!--
> > body{margin-left:10px;margin-right:10px;margin-top:10px;margin
>-bottom:10p=
> > x;}
> > -->
> > </STYLE>
> >
> > <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.6000.16414"
>name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
> > <BODY marginbottom=3D"10" margintop=3D"10" marginright=3D"10" =
> > marginleft=3D"10">
> > <DIV dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><SPAN
>class=3D096214321-19032007><FONT =
> > face=3D"Courier New"=20
> > color=3D#008000 size=3D2><EM>The Northern Light "Custom
> > Search Folders" =
> > patent=20
> > (5,924,090</EM><EM>) was applied for on May 1, 1997 (which is
>why NL =
> > could claim=20
> > "patent pending" when it opened to the public on August 5) and
>was =
> > granted on=20
> > July 13, 1999. (The inventor, by the way, was Marc F.
> > Krellenstein =
> > of=20
> > Chestnut Hill, MA, with Northern Light Technology LLC of
> > Cambridge, MA, =
> > being=20
> > the assignee.)</EM></FONT></SPAN></DIV>
> > <DIV dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><SPAN
> > class=3D096214321-19032007><EM><FONT=20
> > face=3D"Courier New" color=3D#008000 =
> > size=3D2></FONT></EM></SPAN> </DIV>
> > <DIV dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><SPAN
>class=3D096214321-19032007><FONT =
> > face=3D"Courier New"=20
> > color=3D#008000 size=3D2><EM>Additionally, from the =
> > prior message below,=20
> > the name is spelled "Vivisimo" and its Web search engine
>is now =
> > called=20
> > "Clusty" (the clustering search engine) at <A=20
> > href=3D"http://clusty.com/">http://clusty.com/</EM><EM></A>.</
>EM></FONT><=
> > /SPAN></DIV>
> > <DIV dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><SPAN
> > class=3D096214321-19032007><EM><FONT=20
> > face=3D"Courier New" color=3D#008000 =
> > size=3D2></FONT></EM></SPAN> </DIV>
> > <DIV dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><SPAN
> > class=3D096214321-19032007><EM><FONT=20
> > face=3D"Courier New" color=3D#008000 size=3D2>All =
> > FWIW.</FONT></EM></SPAN></DIV>
> > <DIV dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><SPAN
> > class=3D096214321-19032007><EM><FONT=20
> > face=3D"Courier New" color=3D#008000 =
> > size=3D2></FONT></EM></SPAN> </DIV>
> > <DIV dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><SPAN
> > class=3D096214321-19032007><EM><FONT=20
> > face=3D"Courier New" color=3D#008000 =
> > size=3D2>Harvey</FONT></EM></SPAN><SPAN=20
> > class=3D096214321-19032007><BR><SPAN lang=3Den-us><FONT
> > face=3D"Courier =
> > New"=20
> > size=3D2>--</FONT></SPAN> <BR><SPAN lang=3Den-us><FONT
> > face=3D"Courier =
> > New"=20
> > size=3D2>=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
>D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
> > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
>D</FONT></S=
> > PAN> <BR><SPAN=20
> > lang=3Den-us><FONT face=3D"Courier New" size=3D2>Harvey E.
>Hahn, =
> > Manager, Technical=20
> > Services Department</FONT></SPAN> <BR><SPAN lang=3Den-us><FONT
>=
> > face=3D"Courier New"=20
> > size=3D2>Arlington Heights (Illinois) Memorial
>Library</FONT></SPAN> =
> > <BR><SPAN=20
> > lang=3Den-us><FONT face=3D"Courier New" size=3D2>847/506-2644 -
>FX: =
> > 847/506-2650 -=20
> > Email: hhahn(at)ahml(dot)info</FONT></SPAN> <BR><SPAN
> > lang=3Den-us><FONT =
> >
> > face=3D"Courier New" size=3D2>OML & Scripts web pages:
><A=20
> > href=3D"http://www.ahml.info/oml/">http://www.ahml.info/oml/</
>A></FONT></=
> > SPAN>=20
> > <BR><SPAN lang=3Den-us><FONT face=3D"Courier New"
> > size=3D2>Personal web =
> > pages: <A=20
> > href=3D"http://users.anet.com/~packrat">http://users.anet.com/
> > ~packrat</A=
> > ></FONT></SPAN>=20
> > </DIV>
> > <DIV></SPAN> </DIV>
> > <DIV><FONT face=3D"Courier New" size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> > <DIV><BR></DIV>
> > <BLOCKQUOTE=20
> > style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT:
> > #008000 2px =
> > solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
> > <DIV class=3DOutlookMessageHeader lang=3Den-us dir=3Dltr
> > align=3Dleft>
> > <HR tabIndex=3D-1>
> > <FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2><B>From:</B> Next generation
> > catalogs for =
> > libraries=20
> > [mailto:NGC4LIB_at_listserv.nd.edu] <B>On Behalf Of </B>Steve=20
> > Watkins<BR><B>Sent:</B> Monday, March 19, 2007 3:36
> > PM<BR><B>To:</B>=20
> > NGC4LIB_at_listserv.nd.edu<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [NGC4LIB]
> > Patents on =
> > faceted=20
> > navigation: what's the impact?<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
> > <DIV></DIV><FONT style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #000000; =
> > FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"=20
> > face=3DVerdana color=3D#000000 size=3D+0>This may have
> > already been =
> > mentioned on=20
> > this list, but Northern Light was a search engine that
> > created folders =
> > that=20
> > served as facets as far back as 1997/98. See <A=20
> > =
> > href=3D"http://web.archive.org/web/19980206192654/http://www.n
> > orthernligh=
> > t.com/"=20
> > =
> > target=3D_blank>http://web.archive.org/web/19980206192654/http
>://www.nort=
> > hernlight.com/</A> for=20
> > an example.<BR><BR>--Steve<BR><BR>Steve
>Watkins<BR>Coordinator of =
> > Technology=20
> > Development<BR>CSU Monterey Bay Library<BR><A=20
> > =
> > href=3D"mailto:steve_watkins_at_csumb.edu">steve_watkins_at_csumb.ed
>u</A><BR><B=
> > R></FONT><FONT=20
> > style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"
>=
> > face=3DArial=20
> > color=3D#000000 size=3D+0><B>Next generation catalogs for
> > libraries =
> > <<A=20
> > =
> > href=3D"mailto:NGC4LIB_at_listserv.nd.edu">NGC4LIB_at_listserv.nd.ed
>u</A>>=20
> > writes:<BR></B></FONT><SPAN style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR:
> > #d0d0d0"><FONT=20
> > style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 9pt; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY: Geneva"
>=
> > face=3DGeneva=20
> > color=3D#000000 size=3D-1>Didn't Visivismo have faceted
>browsing? =
> > I remember=20
> > folders or something<BR>similar.<BR><BR>Shawn<BR><BR>> =
> > -----Original=20
> > Message-----<BR>> From: Next generation catalogs for =
> > libraries<BR>> [<A=20
> > href=3D"mailto:NGC4LIB_at_listserv.nd.edu"=20
> > target=3D_blank>mailto:NGC4LIB_at_listserv.nd.edu</A>] On Behalf
>Of =
> > Andrew=20
> > Nagy<BR>> Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 3:34 PM<BR>> To:
><A=20
> > =
> > href=3D"mailto:NGC4LIB_at_listserv.nd.edu">NGC4LIB_at_listserv.nd.ed
>u</A><BR>&g=
> > t;=20
> > Subject: Re: [NGC4LIB] Patents on faceted navigation:
> > what's<BR>> =
> > the=20
> > impact?<BR>><BR>> Danielle Plumer wrote:<BR>> >
>"Prior =
> > art" is the=20
> > way to attack patents such as these, as<BR>> Nancy
> > states.<BR>>=20
> > ><BR>> > The Open Source Development Laboratories
>has an=20
> > "Open<BR>> Source as Prior Art" site at
> > http://osapa.org/. The goal =
> >
> > is<BR>> to protect innovation by reviewing, and
>challenging =
> > as<BR>>=20
> > necessary, "poor quality" patents that threaten the<BR>> =
> > development of new=20
> > software tools.<BR>> ><BR>> I have been surfing
> > around the =
> > Wayback=20
> > Machine on archive.org to find<BR>> instances of Faceted
> > searching, =
> > but=20
> > have not found much. It's hard to<BR>> find a site
>on the =
> > wayback=20
> > machine that has more than the<BR>> front page.
> I<BR>> =
> > have looked=20
> > at dell.com, ebay.com, cnet.com and since I cannot use
>the<BR>> =
> > searching=20
> > mechanism it's hard to find instances of faceted
>search<BR>> =
> > results, but=20
> > even so I haven't found good instances of<BR>> faceted =
> > browsing<BR>>=20
> > with results on the same screen. Before 2001 that =
> > is.<BR>><BR>>=20
> > Andrew<BR>><BR></FONT></SPAN><FONT=20
> > style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY:
>Verdana" =
> > face=3DVerdana=20
> > color=3D#000000
>size=3D+0><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></BODY></HTML>
> >
> > ------_=_NextPart_001_01C76A73.2761A066--
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:15:19 -0400
> > From: Charley Pennell <cpennell_at_UNITY.NCSU.EDU>
> > Subject: Re: what is in this "next generation" library catalog
>thing?
> >
> > Harvey-
> >
> > Are you sure that the correct analogy is the "rental attitude
>of
> > today's consumers". If there is any trend in U.S. publishing
>today it
> > is towards authors and, more particularly, publishers retaining
>rights
> > to their work, especially after passage of the 75 year
>copyright
> > legislation. I'm sure that it is not an accident that this is
>just
> > about the average lifespan of a human being. Many consumers
> > think that
> > they have "bought" a recording, software, an e-book, etc. only
>to find
> > that they have only licensed it, with a lot of the rights
> > traditionally
> > held by the print purchaser (right to copy for one's own use,
>right to
> > lend or sell, etc.), now subject to restriction and possibly
> > additional
> > charges. As owner of a collection of DVDs, you may possess
> > them at the
> > moment but your use is restricted to personal viewing only.
>You can't
> > rent a theatre and show the contents like you could do with
> > films in the
> > old days. Or post portions to YouTube, for that matter. Plus,
>who
> > knows how long that DVD will last before it self-destructs.
> >
> > Charley
> >
> > Hahn, Harvey wrote:
> > > Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
> > > |Despite some of the following comments, I still believe we
>need to
> > > |think harder about collections when it comes to this "'next
> > > |generation' library thing":
> > > |
> > > | * Why "collect"? Don't you mean "provide access to" or
> > > | "provide records that link to"? --Dan Lester
> > > |
> > > | * To me the question is not "what's in it?" but "what
>does it
> > > | connect to?" and "what are it's services?" --Karen
>Coyle
> > >
> > > I think there's always a "collection" involved. The real
> > question, I
> > > think, is who owns it? Does the local library own all or
> > some of it, or
> > > do one or more remote sites own part or all of it (e.g., the
>fully
> > > digital library)? The "services" attitude is, I think,
>directly
> > > influenced by the "rental" attitude of today's consumers.
> > For example,
> > > I *own* my personal DVD collection; many/most other people
> > *rent* their
> > > DVDs. Either way, you pay, and there is the ability to
> > view the DVDs.
> > > However, down the road, as "older" and less-used content is
> > removed from
> > > the market, the renters can no longer view some DVDs that
> > they used to
> > > because they are no longer available; on the other hand,
>since I
> > > personally own them, I *can* still view them. Thus, the
> > renters "pay"
> > > again in that access is no longer available to particular
> > content. This
> > > is the part related to collections and services that I have
>not yet
> > > heard here: there is increasing risk related to access as
> > we become more
> > > and more dependent on online digital content. Conservation
>and
> > > preservation of digital content for the future becomes
>virtually
> > > impossible because the content is owned and controlled by
> > others (mostly
> > > with commercial interests) and is governed by the DMCA. If
> > content is
> > > withdrawn or available only at exhorbitant costs, where do
>libraries
> > > stand and what have we gained with an emphasis on electronic
>access,
> > > which is tenuous at best because it is out of our control.
> > Anyway, just
> > > some more food for thought...
> > >
> > > Harvey
> > >
> > > --
> > > ===========================================
> > > Harvey E. Hahn, Manager, Technical Services Department
> > > Arlington Heights (Illinois) Memorial Library
> > > 847/506-2644 - FX: 847/506-2650 - Email:
>hhahn(at)ahml(dot)info
> > > OML & Scripts web pages: http://www.ahml.info/oml/
> > > Personal web pages: http://users.anet.com/~packrat
> > >
> >
> > --
> > __________________________________
>__________________________________
> > """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
>""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
> > Charley Pennell
>mailto:cpennell_at_unity.ncsu.edu
> > Principal Cataloger for Metadata voice:
>(919)515-2743
> > Metadata and Cataloging Department fax:
>(919)515-7292
> > NCSU Libraries, Box 7111
> > North Carolina State University
> > Raleigh, NC 27695-7111
> >
> > Adjunct Librarian, Memorial University of Newfoundland
> > World Wide Web:
>http://www.ibiblio.org/hillwilliam/chuckhome.html
> > __________________________________
>__________________________________
> > """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
>""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 23:36:11 -0000
> > From: David Pattern <d.c.pattern_at_HUD.AC.UK>
> > Subject: Re: Patents on faceted navigation: what's the impact?
> >
> > This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> >
> > ------_=_NextPart_001_01C76A7F.603A0609
> > Content-Type: text/plain;
> > charset="iso-8859-1"
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> >
> > The late Dr. Steve Pollitt was working on OPAC "view-based
> > searching" (i.e.=
> > facets) in the early 1990s and, I believe, is cited in the
> > Endeca patent. =
> > I'm sure there was a working test system based on the
> > University of Hudder=
> > sfield's library catalogue in the late 1990s (probably 1998).
> >
> > http://www.oclc.org/research/dss/pollitt.htm
> >
> > It's to our eternal shame that the library director at the
> > time refused t=
> > o co-operate in Steve's request to pilot his system in the live
>OPAC.
> >
> > By around 2001, he was regularly demoing an test OPAC
> > interface (that use=
> > d facets) of Dewey at conferences in the UK. Sadly Steve
> > passed away befor=
> > e I took up position as the Library Systems Manager,
> > otherwise I would have=
> > pushed strongly for his pioneering work to be integrated
> > into our live OPA=
> > C.
> >
> > In a weird piece of serendipity, the same technology park in
> > which Steve =
> > set up his company ("View Based Systems") that specialised in
> > implementing =
> > facetted searching also houses a gallery named "North Light":
> > http://www.no=
> > rthlightgallery.org.uk/
> >
> > regards
> > Dave Pattern
> > Library Systems Manager
> > University of Huddersfield
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > From: Next generation catalogs for libraries on behalf of Hahn,
>Harvey
> > Sent: Mon 19/03/2007 22:08
> > To: NGC4LIB_at_listserv.nd.edu
> > Subject: Re: [NGC4LIB] Patents on faceted navigation: what's
> > the impact?
> >
> >
> > The Northern Light "Custom Search Folders" patent (5,924,090)
> > was applied=
> > for on May 1, 1997 (which is why NL could claim "patent
> > pending" when it o=
> > pened to the public on August 5) and was granted on July 13,
> > 1999. (The in=
> > ventor, by the way, was Marc F. Krellenstein of Chestnut
> > Hill, MA, with Nor=
> > thern Light Technology LLC of Cambridge, MA, being the
>assignee.)
> >
> > Additionally, from the prior message below, the name is
> > spelled "Vivisimo=
> > " and its Web search engine is now called "Clusty" (the
> > clustering search e=
> > ngine) at http://clusty.com/.
> >
> > All FWIW.
> >
> > Harvey
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > This transmission is confidential and may be legally
> > privileged. If you r=
> > eceive it in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail
> > and remove it fr=
> > om your system. If the content of this e-mail does not relate
> > to the busine=
> > ss of the University of Huddersfield, then we do not endorse
> > it and will ac=
> > cept no liability.
> > ------_=_NextPart_001_01C76A7F.603A0609
> > Content-Type: text/html
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> >
> > <HTML dir=3Dltr><HEAD><TITLE></TITLE>
> >
> > <STYLE type=3Dtext/css>
> > <!--
> > body{margin-left:10px;margin-right:10px;margin-top:10px;margin
>-bottom:10p=
> > x;}
> > -->
> > </STYLE>
> >
> > <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.6000.16414"
>name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
> > <BODY><P>
> > <DIV id=3DidOWAReplyText40062 dir=3Dltr>
> > <DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#000000
> > size=3D2>The late Dr. S=
> > teve Pollitt was working on OPAC "view-based searching" (i.e.
> > facets) in th=
> > e early 1990s and, I believe, is cited in the Endeca
> > patent. I'm sure=
> > there was a working test system based on the University
> > of Huddersfie=
> > ld's library catalogue in the late 1990s (probably
> > 1998). </FONT=
> > ></DIV>
> > <DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#000000
> > size=3D2></FONT> <=
> > /DIV>
> > <DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size=3D2><A
> > href=3D"htt=
> > p://www.oclc.org/research/dss/pollitt.htm">http://www.oclc.org
>/research/dss=
> > /pollitt.htm</A></FONT></DIV>
> > <DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#000000
> > size=3D2></FONT> <=
> > /DIV>
> > <DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#000000
> > size=3D2>It's to our et=
> > ernal shame that the library director at the time refused to
> > co-operate in =
> > Steve's request to pilot his system in the live
>OPAC.</FONT></DIV>
> > <DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> > <DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>By around 2001, he
> > was regular=
> > ly demoing an test OPAC interface (that used facets) of Dewey
> > at conference=
> > s in the UK. Sadly Steve passed away before I took up
> > position as the=
> > Library Systems Manager, otherwise I would have pushed
> > strongly for h=
> > is pioneering work to be integrated into our live
> > OPAC.</FONT></DIV>
> > <DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> > <DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>In a weird piece
> > of serendipit=
> > y, the same technology park in which Steve set up
> > his company ("V=
> > iew Based Systems") that specialised in implementing facetted
> > searching als=
> > o houses a gallery named "North Light": <A
> > href=3D"http://www.northlightgal=
> >
>lery.org.uk/">http://www.northlightgallery.org.uk/</A></FONT></DI
>V>
> > <DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> > <DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>regards</FONT></DIV>
> > <DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Dave
>Pattern</FONT></DIV>
> > <DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Library Systems
> > Manager</FONT>=
> > </DIV>
> > <DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>University of
> > Huddersfield</FO=
> > NT></DIV>
> > <DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial
>size=3D2></FONT> </DIV></DIV>
> > <DIV dir=3Dltr><BR>
> > <HR tabIndex=3D-1>
> > <FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2><B>From:</B> Next generation
> > catalogs for li=
> > braries on behalf of Hahn, Harvey<BR><B>Sent:</B> Mon
> > 19/03/2007 22:08<BR><=
> > B>To:</B> NGC4LIB_at_listserv.nd.edu<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re:
> > [NGC4LIB] Patents =
> > on faceted navigation: what's the impact?<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
> > <DIV>
> > <DIV dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><SPAN
> > class=3D096214321-19032007><FONT face=
> > =3D"Courier New" color=3D#008000 size=3D2><EM>The Northern
> > Light "Custom Se=
> > arch Folders" patent (5,924,090</EM><EM>) was applied for on
> > May 1, 1997 (w=
> > hich is why NL could claim "patent pending" when it opened to
> > the public on=
> > August 5) and was granted on July 13, 1999. (The
> > inventor, by the wa=
> > y, was Marc F. Krellenstein of Chestnut Hill, MA, with
> > Northern Light Techn=
> > ology LLC of Cambridge, MA, being the
> > assignee.)</EM></FONT></SPAN></DIV>
> > <DIV dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><SPAN
> > class=3D096214321-19032007><EM><FONT fa=
> > ce=3D"Courier New" color=3D#008000
> > size=3D2></FONT></EM></SPAN> </DIV>
> > <DIV dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><SPAN
> > class=3D096214321-19032007><FONT face=
> > =3D"Courier New" color=3D#008000 size=3D2><EM>Additionally,
> > from the p=
> > rior message below, the name is spelled "Vivisimo"
> > and its Web se=
> > arch engine is now called "Clusty" (the clustering search
> > engine) at <=
> > A
> > href=3D"http://clusty.com/">http://clusty.com/</EM><EM></A>.</
>EM></FONT><=
> > /SPAN></DIV>
> > <DIV dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><SPAN
> > class=3D096214321-19032007><EM><FONT fa=
> > ce=3D"Courier New" color=3D#008000
> > size=3D2></FONT></EM></SPAN> </DIV>
> > <DIV dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><SPAN
> > class=3D096214321-19032007><EM><FONT fa=
> > ce=3D"Courier New" color=3D#008000 size=3D2>All
> > FWIW.</FONT></EM></SPAN></D=
> > IV>
> > <DIV dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><SPAN
> > class=3D096214321-19032007><EM><FONT fa=
> > ce=3D"Courier New" color=3D#008000
> > size=3D2></FONT></EM></SPAN> </DIV>
> > <DIV dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><SPAN
> > class=3D096214321-19032007><EM><FONT fa=
> > ce=3D"Courier New" color=3D#008000
> > size=3D2>Harvey</FONT></EM></SPAN><SPAN =
> > class=3D096214321-19032007><BR></DIV></SPAN>
> > <DIV><FONT style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #000000;
> > FONT-FAMILY: Verdana=
> > " face=3DVerdana color=3D#000000 size=3D+0><FONT
> > face=3D"Courier New" size=
> > =3D2></FONT> </DIV></FONT></DIV> </P>
> > <P><FONT face=3DTahoma><FONT face=3DTahoma></FONT></FONT></P>
> > <P><FONT face=3DTahoma><FONT face=3DTahoma><IMG
> > alt=3D"1 Vision. Our students voted us top new University for
> > student sat=
> > isfaction"
> > hspace=3D0
> > src=3D"http://www.hud.ac.uk/images/emails/1vision_footer-b.gif=
> > "
> > align=3Dbaseline border=3D0></FONT></FONT></P>
> > <P><FONT face=3DTahoma><FONT face=3DTahoma>This transmission
> > is confident=
> > ial and may
> > be legally privileged. If you receive it in error, please
> > notify us immed=
> > iately
> > by e-mail and remove it from your system. If the content of
> > this e-mail d=
> > oes not
> > relate to the business of the University of Huddersfield,
> > then we do not =
> > endorse
> > it and will accept no
>liability.<BR></FONT></FONT></P></BODY></HTML>
> >
> > ------_=_NextPart_001_01C76A7F.603A0609--
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 17:01:57 -0700
> > From: DrWeb <drweb2_at_GMAIL.COM>
> > Subject: Re: what is in this "next generation" library catalog
>thing?
> >
> > Using Google Scholar, I found a few actual copies of the
> > article online..
> > some were class reading documents.. so, I'm not sure this
>access to
> > read/browse the article is fully "legal," but here goes..
> >
> > http://courses.washington.edu/lis522ab/readingdocs/Lee-Whatisa
>collection.pdf
> >
> > And one at JHU :)..
> > http://www.welch.jhu.edu/about/whatiscollect.pdf
> >
> > Thanks, Jonathan, for the points and post.. it has been about
> > seven years,
> > and we still go 'round 'n' 'round..
> >
> > Best,
> > DrWeb
> >
> > --
> > P. Michael McCulley aka DrWeb
> > mailto:drweb_at_san.rr.com
> > San Diego, CA
> > http://drweb.typepad.com/
> >
> > Quote of the Moment:
> > On the other hand, you have different fingers.
> > Monday, March 19, 2007 4:53:49 PM
> >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Next generation catalogs for libraries
> > >[mailto:NGC4LIB_at_listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of Jonathan
>Rochkind
> > >Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 8:49 AM
> > >To: NGC4LIB_at_listserv.nd.edu
> > >Subject: Re: [NGC4LIB] what is in this "next generation"
> > >library catalog thing?
> > >
> > >Ha! I found the citation I was thinking of. (Apparently I have
>some
> > >reference skills after all).
> > >
> > >Lee, H-L (2000) What is a collection?. Journal of the American
> > >Society for
> > >Information Science; 51 (12) Oct 2000, p.1106-13
> > [rest snipped]
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 17:24:16 -0700
> > From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle_at_KCOYLE.NET>
> > Subject: Re: what is in this "next generation" library catalog
>thing?
> >
> > Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
> > > Despite some of the following comments, I still believe we
>need to
> > > think harder about collections when it comes to this "'next
> > > generation' library thing":
> > > ...
> > >
> > > IMHO, collections without services are useless, and services
>without
> > > collections are empty. A library needs both collections AND
>services
> > > in order to practice librarianship.
> > Yes, you need stuff, and something that you do with stuff. But
>I don't
> > think we have a "collection" in the same sense as we did when
> > "collection" meant "things that the library owns." The concept
>of
> > collection to me always implies selection and some definition
>of
> > appropriateness. It doesn't necessarily imply ownership.
> >
> > In our virtual and networked world, "collection" might be
> > closer to the
> > term "bibliography" -- that is, an organized group of items
> > related to a
> > particular topic or investigation, for a particular group of
>users,
> > whether the library owns them or not. Because it's hard to put
>a firm
> > line around what is or isn't accessible to a user
> > (considering ILL, and
> > that new things appear on the net every minute) it makes more
>sense to
> > organize information than to organize items.
> >
> > What the library "collects" may in the future be exhibited as
> > a "best of
> > ...." or "basic readings in...." type of organization of
>information
> > resources. This is actually a much harder task than
> > purchasing a select
> > set of items within your budget, because it requires you to
>cover a
> > wider range of information sources. As for access, I think that
>the
> > access issues are becoming less pressing as more materials
> > are added to
> > a shared store of digital copies. It doesn't mean that those
>materials
> > are "open access" -- but that libraries are able to provide
>access now
> > to a great wealth of materials that didn't used to be available
>beyond
> > the few owning institutions. If we don't create our
> > "collection" out of
> > that vast store, then we are cheating our users.
> >
> > kc
> >
> > --
> > -----------------------------------
> > Karen Coyle / Digital Library Consultant
> > kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://www.kcoyle.net
> > ph.: 510-540-7596
> > fx.: 510-848-3913
> > mo.: 510-435-8234
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > End of NGC4LIB Digest - 18 Mar 2007 to 19 Mar 2007 (#2007-58)
> > *************************************************************
David Dorman
US Marketing Manager, Index Data
52 Whitman Ave.
West Hartford, Connecticut 06107
dorman_at_indexdata.com
860-389-1568 or toll free 866-489-1568
fax: 860-561-5613
INDEX DATA Means Business
for Open Source and Open Standards
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
www.indexdata.com
Received on Tue Mar 20 2007 - 06:49:24 EDT
