Re: digest mode

From: Iris Jastram <ijastram_at_nyob>
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 14:55:48 -0500
To: NGC4LIB_at_listserv.nd.edu
And I have 95 Gmail invites left.

On 6/10/06, Walt Crawford <waltcrawford_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> As I read this thread in Gmail, I'll third that recommendation--and I have
> 99 invitations left, if anyone's bereft. (I plan to use that threading
> capability strategically, but that's not relevant to NGC4Lib, which of
> course I have set up to autotag this list's posts.)
> walt crawford, waltcrawford_at_gmail.com
>
>
> On 6/10/06, Tim Hodson < hodson.tim_at_googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Gmail is definately best for conversation threading.
> > if anyone wants an invite, I have no friends, so still have my 100! :)
> > Tim
> > ---------------------------------------------
> > http: informationtakesover.co.uk
> > hodson.tim_at_gmail.com
> >
> >
> > On 10/06/06, Steve Lawson < bevedog_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Forgive the self-link, but for those looking for a way to manage
> > > high-volume mailing lists, take a look at my blog post on "Managing
> > > mailing lists with Gmail":
> > >
> > > http://tinyurl.com/eqgt9
> > >
> > > By using a rule to auto-label messages from each list I receive,
> > > auto-archiving those messages, and relying on Gmail's very good
> > > threading of "conversations," I can check in on each list  a few times
> > > a week without getting overwhelmed. Works great for this list.
> > >
> > > This may not work for everyone, but it works for me, and I greatly
> > > prefer it to digest mode, where the repetition of quotes from previous
> > > messages always drives me nuts.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Steve Lawson, Humanities Librarian
> > > Tutt Library, Colorado College
> > > slawson_at_coloradocollege.edu
> > > IM (AIM & Yahoo!): tuttlawson
> > > blog: http://library.coloradocollege.edu/steve/
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ---
> > Tim Hodson
> > informationtakesover.co.uk
> > www.timhodson.co.uk
> >
>
>


--
Iris Jastram
The Pegasus Librarian
http://pegasuslibrarian.blogspot.com
Received on Sun Jun 11 2006 - 16:01:49 EDT