Buckner, 'ALA-Wide Program Planning Fair: A Success by Everyone's Standards', LITA Newsletter v15n02 URL = http://hegel.lib.ncsu.edu/stacks/serials/lita/lita-v15n02-buckner-alawide V15N2.PROGFAIR LITANEWS ---------------------------------------- The ALA-Wide Program Planning Fair: A Success by Everyone's Standards THE INVITATION READ, "Would you like to learn more about what it takes to put on a successful ALA program? Meet committee chairs and program planners from other ALA divisions? Explore mutual interests and program co-sponsorship opportunities? The Program Planning Fair is for you!" On Saturday, February 5, 1994, more than 60 conference program planners from ASCLA, ACRL, ALCTS, AASL, LAMA, LITA, PLA and RASD attended a joint program planning workshop and exchange sponsored by LITA's Program Planning Committee and facilitated by members of the CLENE Round Table. Led by CLENE members Diane Johnson (University of Missouri School of Library and Information Science) and Duncan Smith (North Carolina State University Library), participants discussed a wide range of programming goals as well as specific strategies for accomplishing those aims, both in divisional and cross-divisional settings. Barriers to Cooperative Program Planning Different divisional planning processes and calendars often discourage collaborative work in program planning. LITA participants in the Program Planning Fair learned that our own requirements are simple and straightforward (12-month lead time and a single Program Planning Committee to navigate) compared to those of other divisions (18-month lead-time and multiple approving bodies). Attendees also commented on the lack of encouragement and tangible rewards for cross-divisional programming. While conference-goers have complained for years about "overprogramming" at the Annual Conference and the number of programs on a given topic that are offered during the same time slot, ALA has done little to foster interdivisional programming. Finally, participants felt that the absence of an easily accessible forum for exchanging program ideas and seeking planning partners was the greatest obstacle to cooperative program planning. Benefits to Cooperative Program Planning Despite these hurdles, participants in the Planning Fair agreed that cooperative planning offers significant benefits, in terms of cost-sharing, meeting ALA members' more advanced information needs and expanding the coverage of various issues from different divisional perspectives. LITA members were especially excited about the potential for LITA (a "type-of-activity" division) to learn more about the automation concerns of members of the several "type-of-library" divisions (such as ACRL, PLA and AASL), and to cosponsor programs with them. Promoting Cooperative Program Planning In the second hour of the Program Planning Fair, attendees listed topical areas that could meet their members' educational and programming needs, then "shopped" for programming partners. A number of matches were made that afternoon, and other participants agreed to talk further after the conference. The CLENE facilitators are using the sign-up sheets circulated at the Fair to generate an attendance list including names, postal and E-mail addresses, ALA divisional affiliations and programming interests. Supplying this list to each participant will promote additional post-conference "cross-pollination." Attendees clearly shared many concerns about how best to achieve cooperative program planning. Among the most popular ideas generated at the session were: *Establish a program planning listserv, to be used by program planners throughout ALA to seek partners and exchange programming ideas *Add the question, " To which ALA divisions do you belong?" to program evaluation forms, as a way of identifying likely divisional cosponsors for future programs *Join with another division or divisions to plan two or three programs on different aspects of a single topic; schedule them to run consecutively on the same day, creating a "mini-conference" on the topic *Ask ALA to make special funding available to divisions that jointly plan and produce a program *Develop an ALA-wide program planning grid that shows each division's programming timelines and requirements What's Next? Participants commented positively about the appealing format of the Program Planning Fair, the value of the "networking" contacts they made there and the value of the information presented. "Wouldn't it be great if we could do this every Midwinter, for all program planners?" asked one attendee, to a chorus of approval. LITA's Program Planning Committee will take the lead in ensuring that the ALA-wide Program Planning Fair becomes a regular Midwinter event, encouraging 1994 attendees to speak with the presidents of their divisions about the ideas that grew out of the Fair and the perceived need for more program collaboration. PPC is actively pursuing the possibility of an ALA-wide programming listserv, as well as the proposed planning grid. LITA's Program Planning Committee will ask its counterparts in other ALA divisions whether these Committees would be interested in having a member of PPC meet with them in Miami, to learn more about their technological interests and how LITA can support them. [If you would like a copy of the Program Planning Fair address and idea list CLENE is generating, send a note to Barbra Buckner Higginbotham, The Library, Brooklyn College, 2900 Bedford Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11210; bxhbc@cunyvm. cuny. edu]--Barbra Buckner Higginbotham