Information Retrieval List Digest 370 (September 1, 1997) URL = http://hegel.lib.ncsu.edu/stacks/serials/irld/irld-370 IRLIST Digest ISSN 1064-6965 September 1, 1997 Volume XIV, Number 32 Issue 370 ********************************************************** I. QUERIES II. JOBS III. NOTICES A. Publications B. Meetings C. Miscellaneous IV. PROJECTS ********************************************************** I. QUERIES I.1. Fr: Gerry McKiernan Re: Beyond Beyond: Data Mining, Knowledge Discovery, and Visualization of MetaDated Collections Beyond Beyond: Data Mining, Knowledge Discovery, and Visualization of MetaDated Collections Over the past several weeks I have posted several queries requesting information relating to Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery in Databases (KDD) and 'neo- conventional' thesauri. While my focus has been on conventional library cataloging formats (i.e. MARC) and conventional subject access inventions (e.g thesauri), my Quest certainly applies to other types of formats and data, most notably MetaData. Thus, [Thus?], I am interested in learning about any and all efforts that have applied Data Mining and/or conventional/neo-conventional Knowledge Discovery and/or Information Visualization to collections that have been wrapped in MetaData (e.g. TEI, Dublin Core, SGML (?), etc.) At this time I am _Not_ Interested in the projects of the geo-spatial realm [This no doubt will become an area that will need to be explored at another point] As always, any and all leads, citations, comments, criticisms, critiques or commentary will be most welcome. Regards, Gerry McKiernan Curator, CyberStacks(Sm) Iowa State University Ames IA 50011 gerrymck@iastate.edu http://www.public.iastate.edu/~CYBERSTACKS ********************************************************** II. JOBS II.1. Fr: Mike Pollastro Re: U. Washington: Systems Librarian GENERAL DESCRIPTION: Under the general direction of the Head, Distributed Computing Systems, serves as Systems Librarian providing support for the planning, development and implementation of the Libraries distributed computing environment, with emphasis on NT and public access computers. The University Libraries is putting strong emphasis on using the World Wide Web and this position will be involved in the development and implementation of Web based information services. SPECIFIC RESPONSIBILITIES AND DUTIES: 1. Assists in the planning and has major responsibility for the implementation of electronic information services to the public, particularly through the use of PCs, NT networking and the Web. Works with departmental Computer-Based Services Librarians as liaison from Library Systems. 2. Participates in the development of overall technology planning for Library Systems. 3. Maintains an awareness of networking standards, technology and national developments related to distributed computing environments delivered through Microsoft NT. Tracks essential technologies and studies their applicability in the local environment. 4. Participates in the analysis of the networked information needs of end-users and library staff, coordinates and implements the design of appropriate solutions. 5. Works with Computing & Communications and Libraries staff to enhance and maintain the public databases we load locally. 6. Responsible for finding and installing tools and processes for web content creation and site management. Acquire, install, and maintain web development tools and utilities. 7. Assists in the support of library database systems as required, including the provision of Web access through specialized APIs. 8. May participate in staff or user education programs. 9. Participates in Libraries-wide committees, task forces, and teams as appropriate. 10. Assumes other responsibilities as assigned; performs other duties as required. QUALIFICATIONS: 1. Graduate degree from a program accredited by the American Library Association required. 2. Systems experience in an academic or other complex library running NT based network services for desktop PCs required. 3. Good oral and written communication skills required. 4. Demonstrated user-centered service philosophy and proven ability to work with both technical and non-technical people required. 5. Production Web experience including the creation and maintenance of CGI scripts required. 6. Must be knowledgeable about current trends in information technology particularly those relating to NT and the World Wide Web. 7. Experience with Innovative Interfaces Inc. is desirable. 8. Experience with Microsoft Access or other relational database systems is also desirable. SALARY: $35,000/year minimum. Starting salary dependent on background and experience. BENEFITS: Librarians are academic personnel and participate in a TIAA-CREF retirement program on a matching basis. Vacation is accrued at the rate of 24 working days per year; sick leave at the rate of 12 working days per year. Excellent medical, dental and life insurance plans. No state or local income tax. APPLY TO: Charles E. Chamberlin Deputy Director of Libraries University of Washington Libraries 482 Allen Library Box 352900 Seattle, Washington 98195-2900 Applicants should submit a letter of application, full resume including a work telephone number and e-mail address, salary requirements, and the names, addresses and telephone numbers of at least three references who are knowledgeable of the applicants qualifications for this position. APPLICATION DEADLINE: To ensure consideration, applications should be received no later than 5:00 p.m., Friday, September 12,1997. University of Washington Libraries Home Page is: http://www.lib.washington.edu The University of Washington, an Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action Employer, is building a culturally diverse staff and strongly encourages applications from female and minority candidates. In compliance with the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, the University is required to verify and document the citizenship or employment authorization of each new employee. ********** II.2. Fr: Lisa M Lehman Re: U. Alaska: Director, Libraries/Information Technology DIRECTOR OF LIBRARIES AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, Search Re-opened THE UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS invites applications and nominations for the position of Director of Libraries and Information Technology. The University seeks a dynamic and innovative leader who will provide vision and direction for the integrated units Elmer E. Rasmuson Division of Libraries and Division of Computing and Communications (C&C). The Director reports to the Provost, is the primary advocate for information technology at UAF, and is a member of the Provost's Council and other policy setting bodies. Rasmuson Library is Alaska's largest library with holdings of more than 1.75 million items, including one of the world's pre-eminent collections of Alaska and polar materials. The Division of Libraries also includes media services and extended-campus library services. The Division of Computing and Communications manages the University of Alaska statewide online catalog, UAF academic and administrative computing, web coordination, training, user services, microcomputer/LAN support, and network services. Rasmuson plays a significant collaborative role in statewide planning and development of information services. Applications must be postmarked by September 30, 1997 A full position description is available upon request and at the UAF web site: http://www.uaf.edu/Library/director/ APPLICATION PROCEDURE: Applications should include a letter of interest, curriculum vita, and the names, phone numbers, addresses, and e-mail addresses of three professional references to: Search Committee for Director of Libraries and Information Technology c/o Rasmuson Library Business Office Attn: Irma Jean Zito, Executive Officer University of Alaska Fairbanks Fairbanks, Alaska 99775-6800 Telephone: (907) 474-6696 Fax: (907) 474-6841 E-mail: fnijz@uaf.edu The University of Alaska Fairbanks is an equal employment opportunity/affirmative action employer and educational institution. Your application for employment with the University of Alaska is subject to public disclosure under the Alaska Public Records Act. ********************************************************** III. NOTICES III.A.1. Fr: Garret Sern Re: Washington Update --- August 22, 1997 FARNET'S Washington Update -- August 22, 1997 IN THIS ISSUE: Department of Commerce receives feedback on registration of Internet domain names Is the FCC rejection of Ameritech legal? FARNET meeting scheduled for late September FARNET needs your feedback! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Written from FARNET's Washington office, "FARNET's Washington Update" is a service to FARNET members and other interested subscribers. We gratefully acknowledge EDUCOM's NTTF and the Coalition for Networked Information (CNI) for additional support. If you would like more information about the Update or would like to offer comments or suggestions, please contact Garret Sern at garret@farnet.org. ********** III.A.7. Fr: Garret Sern Re: Washington Update 8/29/97 FARNET'S WASHINGTON UPDATE --- AUGUST 29, 1997 IN THIS ISSUE: Digital future coalition holds forum on intellectual property issues in the digital age. Congress returns from vacation to full agenda of telecom issues. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Written from FARNET's Washington office, "FARNET's Washington Update" is a service to FARNET members and other interested subscribers. We gratefully acknowledge EDUCOM's NTTF and the Coalition for Networked Information (CNI) for additional support. If you would like more information about the Update or would like to offer comments or suggestions, please contact Garret Sern at garret@farnet.org. ********** III.B.4. Fr: Pattee Fletcher Re: Information Technology in Libraries Submission Deadline, OCTOBER 20, 1997 Information Resources Management Association International Conference "Effective Utilization and Management of Emerging Information Technologies. May 17 - 20, 1998 Boston MA Track Chair: Patricia D. Fletcher University of Maryland, Baltimore County 410-455-3154 410-455-1073 (FAX) fletcher@umbc.edu Developments in information technology have had a major impact in libraries of all types over the last two decades. The challenges for libraries arise from the advent of the computer and the proliferation of cheaper, faster, and more efficient means of accessing information. These challenges are profound and have a wide reach in the library world. The role of the libraries in a digital world is uncertain and challenging. How libraries respond to the many implications of the information technologies will have a determining effect in their sustainability. Ethical issues of privacy, intellectual property, censorship, and knowledge organization are also of major concerns to libraries in today's networked environment. This IRMA track seeks to expand professional knowledge in this critical arena. TOPICS OF INTEREST INCLUDE: * Public Access to Information * Technology for Special Libraries * Virtual Libraries * Electronic Networks for Library Services * The Role of the Librarian in the Digital Library * Knowledge Organization Challenges * Electronic Publishing and Intellectual Property Rights * Full Text Document and Citation Services * Cost Models for Internet Services IMPORTANT DATES: Deadline for receipt of papers/proposals: October 20, 12997 Notification of Acceptance/Rejection: November 28, 1997 Deadline for Receipt of final papers: January 17, 1998 Early Registration Ends: April 3, 1998 Conference Dates: May 17-20, 1998 Submission Categories and Guidelines are available at the IRMA web site: http://www.hbg.psu.edu/Faculty/mlk/IRMA.html Send all submissions to: Medhi Khosrowpour Program Chair 1998 IRMA International Conference 1331 E. Chocolate Avenue Hershey, PA 17033-1117, USA (717) 948-6344 (717) 533-8661 (FAX) m1k@psu.edu ********** III.B.1. Fr: Richard Gedye Re: Site Licensing Seminar, London, UK *** UK SERIALS GROUP *** Http://epip.lboro.ac.uk/uksg/ One-day seminar : 9 October 1997 CONSORTIUM AND SITE LICENSING or What do we all really want? At the Science Societies Lecture Theatre, New Burlington Place, London W1 Libraries are forming consortia in order to share resources and to bring their combined purchasing power to negotiate advantageous terms for the supply of journals and other research literature. Many are already negotiating site licences for both printed and electronic resources direct with individual publishers, and grappling with the complexities of unfamiliar concepts and terminology. Publishers are trying to meet new demands from libraries while maintaining the financial viability of their activities for the future. This seminar will bring these issues together and expose the concerns of both publishers and librarians in order to aid mutual understanding and suggest some ways forward. It has been designed for senior managers and policy makers in libraries, publishing houses, subscription agencies, A & I services and other library utility and service agencies. PROGRAMME Chair: University Librarian (to be confirmed) Introduction, Chair History and development of site licences, Martin White, TFPL A scene-setting survey of the development of site licences, from CD-ROM to the UK PSLI, offerings from individual publishers, and the PA/JISC model licence discussions What makes a negotiating unit? Jill Taylor Roe, University of Newcastle The development of UK purchasing consortia and statewide purchasing activity in the USA has illustrated the tensions between the centralised direction of purchasing and traditional library freedom and discretion; the lessons to be learned Publishing objectives and the new paradigm, Bob Campbell, Blackwell Science Improving access and securing the revenue base; the impact of consortia purchasing and site licensing on the economics of publishing; the feasibility of publishers working together to create multi-publisher licences by subject Tailoring licensed rights to users' requirements, Sally Morris, John Wiley, and Elizabeth Heaps, University of York A publisher's and a librarian's view of what a licence should include and/or exclude; what terms to look out for; the need for coordination and consistency over different licences, and for simplicity of administration Inter-library loan, fair dealing and the electronic environment, Fred Friend, UCL A robust view of what rights libraries need in order to provide a full service to faculty and students; the importance of fair dealing and inter-library loan in electronic materials The role of aggregators, Albert Prior, Swets & Zeitlinger A survey of the role of intermediaries or content aggregators in facilitating access to electronic journals: subscription agents, library utilities, secondary publishers etc; is there a role for intermediaries in co-ordinating multi-publisher subject-based licences? Where does the future lie? A look to developments in the next ten years A summary by the Chair of the major issues exposed by the seminar, and a forecast of how they will be resolved Discussion and wrap-up FOR COMPLETE INFORMATION, CONTACT: Jill Tolson UK Serials Group Business Manager 114 Woodstock Road Witney OX8 6DY UK Tel: 01993 703466 Fax: 01993 778879 E-mail: uksg@dial.pipex.com BOOKING FORM Consortium and Site Licensing London, 9 October 1997 ********** III.C.1. Fr: Richard Hill Re: Borgman is UC Presidential Chair in IS [From a UCLANEWS release. August 15, 1997] "UCLA Professor Christine Borgman has been appointed to the University of California's Presidential Chair in Information Studies, which she will hold for five years. UC President Richard Atkinson approved establishment of the endowed chair specifically in honor of Borgman's distinguished career and in recognition of the growing importance and interdisciplinary nature of her field. "In his letter of congratulations to Borgman, UCLA Chancellor Albert Carnesale noted that her interdisciplinary research is "at the nexus of information technology, information-related behavior and information policy (which) is an important area where innovative activities will be taking place on this campus...Your appointment to this endowed chair honors your creative contributions to UCLA as well as nationally and internationhally, in this field." ********************************************************** IV. PROJECTS IV.C.1. Fr: Maria Zemankova Re: US Researchers: New NSF Grant Proposal Guide This message is to notify you of important changes in NSF proposal preparation guidelines. Revised versions of the NSF Grant Proposal Guide (GPG)(NSF 98-2) and Proposal Forms Kit (NSF 98-3) are currently being printed. They will replace the prior versions of the GPG (NSF 95-27) and the Proposal Forms Kit (NSF 95-28). Among other things, this revision implements the new NSF merit review criteria that were approved by the National Science Board on March 28, 1997, and disseminated in Important Notice 121, New Criteria for NSF Proposals, dated July 10, 1997. Other sections of the GPG have been revised, as appropriate, for clarity as well as to make the Guide consistent with current NSF policies, practices and procedures. A complete list of significant changes is included on pages iii and iv of the GPG. Highlights from that list, for use in proposal preparation, are included below. As stated in Important Notice 121, the new merit review criteria for reviewing proposals will be effective for proposals submitted on or after October 1, 1997. For consistency with this requirement, this version of the GPG also will be effective October 1, 1997. The complete text of the revised GPG is now available electronically on NSF's home page at http://www.nsf.gov/bfa/cpo/gpg/start.htm. The Proposal Forms Kit containing revised forms formatted in Microsoft Word for Windows 6.0. also is available on the NSF home page. Effective October 1, 1997, these electronic versions may be used in submission of proposals to NSF. We are strongly encouraging our customers make use of the Web in accessing the new GPG. Paper copies of the revised GPG will be sent to NSF customer communities in late August. Please address any questions or comments about the GPG to the Division of Contracts, Policy & Oversight, Policy Office, on 703-306-1243 or by e-mail to policy@nsf.gov. Jean I. Feldman Head, Policy Office Division of Contracts, Policy & Oversight SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT PROPOSAL PREPARATION CHANGES o Chapter I, Introduction, Paragraph E, "When to Submit Proposals" has been revised to clarify that it is when the proposal is received by the Foundation that determines whether a proposal has met an established deadline date. For late proposals, the "postmark" policy has been expanded to include carriers other than the U.S. Postal Service. This section also has been supplemented with language regarding deadlines that fall on weekends and holidays. o Chapter I - Paragraph F has been renamed "How to Submit Proposals" as well as reorganized to: - clarify that a proposal only needs to be submitted once to NSF, even if review by multiple programs is envisioned. This shoul help reduce the submission of multiple copies of the same proposal for simultaneous review by different program offices. The submission of duplicate or substantially similar proposals concurrently for review by more than one program without prior NSF approval may result in the return of the redundant proposals.- expand the coverage to include a "receipt policy" for proposals submitted electronically via the NSF FastLane Project. - revise the address to move the NSF program from the first line of the address in order to avoid having proposals delivered directly to NSF program offices. o Chapter II, Instructions for Proposal Preparation, has been supplemented with language indicating that, "For standard proposals, FastLane preparation and submission is the preferred method. Unless otherwise specified in a program announcement or solicitation, however, proposals may continue to be submitted in paper form." o Chapter II - Paragraph C, Format of the Proposal, has been modified to permit copies other than the original to use a simple binding, such as a comb binding, for use in proposal submission. o Chapter II - Paragraph D, Sections of the Proposal, has been revised to delete the following four proposal forms: - Project Summary, NSF Form 1358; - Project Description, NSF Form 1360; - References Cited, NSF Form 1361; and - Biographical Sketch, NSF Form 1362. In lieu of these forms, proposers are requested to use the instructions in the Grant Proposal Guide to complete these sections of the proposal. o Chapter II - Paragraph D.2, Project Summary, has been updated to require the Project Summary to also describe the potential impact of the project on advancing knowledge, science and mathematics education, and/or human resource development. o Chapter II - Paragraph D.4, Project Description, has been revised to: - remind proposers that proposals to NSF will now be reviewed using the new merit review criteria - require the proposal to indicate as part of the Project Description, "any broader impacts of the proposed activity." o Chapter II - Paragraph D.5, References Cited, has been clarified to require the names of authors to appear in the same sequence in which they appear in the referenced publication. o Chapter II - Paragraph D.6, Biographical Sketches, has been revised to require one listing of persons who have collaborated on a project. Previously, this information was located in two places in the Biographical Sketch. In addition, when providing names of individuals, the organizational affiliation should be added to differentiate between individuals with duplicate names. o Chapter II - Paragraph D.7.f.(v) has been updated to specify that subaward budgets need to be signed by the Authorized Organizational Representative of the organization receiving the subaward. o Chapter II - Paragraphs D.12.d. and e. Vertebrate Animals and Human Subjects, have been modified to reflect "just-in-time" submission for organizational approvals for use of Vertebrate Animals and Human Subjects in the proposal submission process. o Chapter III - NSF Proposal Processing and Review, Paragraph A, has been revised to reflect changes to NSF's merit review criteria. o Chapter IV - Withdrawals, Returns, and Declinations, Paragraph B, has been updated to include two additional reasons for the return of proposals by NSF: (1) the proposal was previously reviewed and declined and has not been substantially revised; or (2) the proposal is a duplicate of or substantially similar to a proposal already under consideration by NSF. ********************************************************** IRLIST Digest is distributed from the University of California, Division of Library Automation, 300 Lakeside Drive, Oakland, CA. 94612-3550. Send subscription requests and submissions to: nancy.gusack@ucop.edu Editorial Staff: Nancy Gusack nancy.gusack@ucop.edu Cliff Lynch (emeritus) cliff@cni.org The IRLIST Archives is set up for anonymous FTP. Using anonymous FTP via the host ftp.dla.ucop.edu, the files will be found in the directory /data/ftp/pub/irl, stored in subdirectories by year (e.g., data/ftp/pub/irl/1993). Search or browse archived IR-L Digest issues on the Web at: http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/idom/irlist/ These files are not to be sold or used for commercial purposes. Contact Nancy Gusack for more information on IRLIST. THE OPINIONS EXPRESSED IN IRLIST DO NOT REPRESENT THOSE OF THE EDITORS OR THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA. AUTHORS ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR MATERIAL. Nancy Gusack Crawford Senior Editor Division of Library Automation University of California Office of the President 300 Lakeside Drive, 8th floor Oakland, California 94612-3550 ncg@dla.ucop.edu 510/987-0565