Hi,
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Eric Lease Morgan <emorgan_at_nd.edu> wrote:
> On Sep 20, 2017, at 12:50 PM, Jonathan Rochkind <jonathan_at_DNIL.NET> wrote:
> > Honestly, if they felt up to it, I would not be at all opposed to an actual
> > recommendation or recommendations from the FCIG. They're the ones who have
> > spent way (way!) more time than anyone else investigating and considering
> > this, I'd appreciate their input in the form of an actual
> > suggestion/recommendation if a preferred path or paths have become clear to
> > them.
>
> We here in FCIG Land have had lots o’ healthy discussion regarding all of the
> issues. That said, I do not believe there is consensus within the Group such
> that an actual recommendation can be made. —Eric Morgan
Indeed. I think I can fairly say that the FCIG does have a consensus
insofar that we recommend that we do not stick with the status quo.
The disagreement lies in which of the alternatives to pursue.
Regards,
Galen
--
Galen Charlton
Infrastructure and Added Services Manager
Equinox Open Library Initiative
phone: 1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
email: gmc_at_equinoxInitiative.org
web: https://equinoxInitiative.org
direct: +1 770-709-5581
cell: +1 404-984-4366
Received on Thu Sep 21 2017 - 16:07:26 EDT