Spam detection software, running on the system "avery.infomotions.com", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see eric_morgan_at_infomotions.com for details. Content preview: Salvete! >> So I wonder - is this what the library system of the future will provide - a way of accumulating citations from librarian-selected sources and retain the subject-sorting of those sources, as well as displaying them by the most-cited? I don't think it's as much laziness on my part that makes me dream of this data-based method of crafting library guides, as much as a search for the authoritative. [...] Content analysis details: (2.7 points, 0.5 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [66.175.211.245 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FROM_LOCAL_HEX From: localpart has long hexadecimal sequence 0.0 FROM_LOCAL_DIGITS From: localpart has long digit sequence 0.7 FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS From: starts with several numbers -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 2.3 FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA Forged mail pretending to be from Mozilla 2.1 FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO Freemail in Reply-To, but not From
attached mail follows:
Salvete!
>>
So I wonder - is this what the library system of the future will provide - a way of accumulating citations from librarian-selected sources and retain the subject-sorting of those sources, as well as displaying them by the most-cited? I don't think it's as much laziness on my part that makes me dream of this data-based method of crafting library guides, as much as a search for the authoritative.
>>
This sounds like the sort of thought experiment one should engage upon in a team setting. What you mentioned sounds quite similar to Fred King's (Washington Medstar) brute forcing of Medline and Koha. I would suspect that you might needs jury rig it a bit more to fit your needs precisely.
Cheers,
Brooke
Received on Fri Sep 08 2017 - 16:54:48 EDT