Spam detection software, running on the system "avery.infomotions.com", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see eric_morgan_at_infomotions.com for details. Content preview: Jenn Dandle and I have made our Code4Lib 2017 workshop materials on "Web Accessibility: Becoming a Stronger Advocate" available online: http://tiny.cc/c4l17-webaxs -- Kate Deibel, PhD | Web Applications Specialist Information Technology Services & Digital Strategies University of Washington Libraries -- [...] Content analysis details: (3.1 points, -1.5 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [66.175.211.245 listed in list.dnswl.org] 3.8 AXB_X_FF_SEZ_S Forefront sez this is spam -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different 0.0 T_HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.7 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist [URIs: tiny.cc] -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000]
attached mail follows:
Jenn Dandle and I have made our Code4Lib 2017 workshop materials on "Web Accessibility: Becoming a Stronger Advocate" available online: http://tiny.cc/c4l17-webaxs -- Kate Deibel, PhD | Web Applications Specialist Information Technology Services & Digital Strategies University of Washington Libraries -- "When Thor shows up, it's always deus ex machina."Received on Tue Mar 14 2017 - 18:48:17 EDT