Spam detection software, running on the system "avery.infomotions.com", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see eric_morgan_at_infomotions.com for details. Content preview: I've crafted my first ever public survey! I'm gathering anecdata about the software-based work library staff do outside the ILS and how it overlaps with work they do inside the ILS. I've talked to colleagues in person and I'm hoping to cast a wider net to see whether or not others are interacting with their ILSes in a similar fashion. [...] Content analysis details: (-1.3 points, -1.5 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [66.175.211.245 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different 0.4 URIBL_GREY Contains an URL listed in the URIBL greylist [URIs: surveymonkey.com] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (tania.fersenheim[at]gmail.com) -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is CUSTOM_MED 0.0 T_HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.5 RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM RBL: SORBS: sender is a spam source [209.85.214.53 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] 0.2 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different 0.0 T_FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different
attached mail follows:
I've crafted my first ever public survey! I'm gathering anecdata about the software-based work library staff do outside the ILS and how it overlaps with work they do inside the ILS. I've talked to colleagues in person and I'm hoping to cast a wider net to see whether or not others are interacting with their ILSes in a similar fashion. The results of the survey will inform a discussion I am participating in at ER&L - "Let’s think – and work – outside the box. Literally" http://sched.co/8wb4 The survey is short (7 questions), anonymous, and I will not use any quotes from it. Scout's Honor!!! Please excuse any typos, lack of scientific rigor &c &c. The survey is open until Friday March 17. https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/LYL227YReceived on Fri Mar 03 2017 - 12:09:30 EST