Spam detection software, running on the system "avery.infomotions.com", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see eric_morgan_at_infomotions.com for details. Content preview: Eric, I think these are questions that go far beyond online services. My public library carries books with descriptions such as: "Learn to interpret and understand the cosmic language being spoken by the crystals, and unlock your own mystical potential." This is crap, to put it mildly, and shouldn't be in the library. If the shelves are filled with pseudo-science and even pseudo-mysticism, we aren't doing our job. This is the whole "neutrality" thread - it's not "neutral" to serve documents without regard to their quality, especially since some of the anti-science/medicine things stated in books can do actual harm. We should at least do as much as Wikipedia does and label the fringe topics as *fringe*, not file them alongside the proven science without comment. (Yes, I know this has issues; I still think it's what we should do.) [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, -1.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different 1.6 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL's NS IP listed in the SBL blocklist [URIs: kcoyle.net] 0.1 URIBL_SBL_A Contains URL's A record listed in the SBL blocklist [URIs: kcoyle.net] -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.0 T_HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000]
attached mail follows:
Eric, I think these are questions that go far beyond online services. My public library carries books with descriptions such as: "Learn to interpret and understand the cosmic language being spoken by the crystals, and unlock your own mystical potential." This is crap, to put it mildly, and shouldn't be in the library. If the shelves are filled with pseudo-science and even pseudo-mysticism, we aren't doing our job. This is the whole "neutrality" thread - it's not "neutral" to serve documents without regard to their quality, especially since some of the anti-science/medicine things stated in books can do actual harm. We should at least do as much as Wikipedia does and label the fringe topics as *fringe*, not file them alongside the proven science without comment. (Yes, I know this has issues; I still think it's what we should do.) As for "safe from surveillance" etc., libraries are not miracle workers. Everything we do is in the real world. Given that the NSA captures every byte conveyed from point A to point B, how *could* libraries do anything about that? We've tried, we've honestly tried to shield our users from overt surveillance, but our only hope is against inept vendors who can be staved off with a simple proxy server. kc On 11/15/16 9:28 AM, Eric Hellman wrote: > I'm sure we've all read articles about the fake news that circulates in an information environment anchored by social media, and the relation of that information environment to the election. > > Libraries are participants in this new information enviroment, so I have some questions. > > 1. Do libraries understand the algorithms and metadata that guide search results and suggestions in the services they provide? Do these algorithms reproduce biases in our society? > 2. Are libraries provide compelling enough services to be meaningful and reliable participants in public discourse? > 3. When libraries connect their services to social networks (for example with a Facebook "Like" button) are they making user's the information environment better or worse? > 4. With many users fearing a more authoritarian state, are libraries providing services that are safe from surveillance by commercial or government entities? > > > Eric Hellman > President, Free Ebook Foundation > Founder, Unglue.it https://unglue.it/ > https://go-to-hellman.blogspot.com/ > twitter: @gluejar > -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: +1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600Received on Tue Nov 15 2016 - 14:34:16 EST