[SPAM 0.9] Re: Post-election statement affirming diversity from Code4Lib?

From: BWS Johnson <000000031041be12-dmarc-request_at_nyob>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 14:18:17 +0000
To: CODE4LIB_at_LISTS.CLIR.ORG
Spam detection software, running on the system "avery.infomotions.com",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
eric_morgan_at_infomotions.com for details.

Content preview:  +1 Brooke > +1 --gmc > > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 4:04 PM,
   Kim, Bohyun <bkim_at_hshsl.umaryland.edu> > wrote: >> Hi Code4Libbers, >> >>
   What do you think about issuing a post-election statement on diversity >
  basically affirming that we stand by it? >> >> If that _IS_ the majority opinion
   in Code4Lib which I am _POSITIVE_ that it > is, then I want to hear it and
   I think others may well! >> >> I just drafted one for LITA (to be out tomorrow
   hopefully). So I have some > wordings that I can offer as a starting point.
   >> >> Thoughts? >> >> Thanks, >> Bohyun >> > > > > -- > Galen Charlton >
  gmcharlt_at_gmail.com > [...] 

Content analysis details:   (0.9 points, -1.0 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 0.5 RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM     RBL: SORBS: sender is a spam source
                            [98.137.12.220 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
 0.7 FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS  From: starts with several numbers
 0.0 FROM_LOCAL_DIGITS      From: localpart has long digit sequence
 0.0 FROM_LOCAL_HEX         From: localpart has long hexadecimal sequence
-0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD        Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain
-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS          SPF: HELO matches SPF record
-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
-1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
                            [score: 0.0000]
 2.1 FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO Freemail in Reply-To, but not From



attached mail follows:


+1

Brooke


> +1 --gmc
> 
> 
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Kim, Bohyun <bkim_at_hshsl.umaryland.edu> 
> wrote:
>>  Hi Code4Libbers,
>> 
>>  What do you think about issuing a post-election statement on diversity 
> basically affirming that we stand by it?
>> 
>>  If that _IS_ the majority opinion in Code4Lib which I am _POSITIVE_ that it 
> is, then I want to hear it and I think others may well!
>> 
>>  I just drafted one for LITA (to be out tomorrow hopefully). So I have some 
> wordings that I can offer as a starting point.
>> 
>>  Thoughts?
>> 
>>  Thanks,
>>  Bohyun
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Galen Charlton
> gmcharlt_at_gmail.com
> 
Received on Tue Nov 15 2016 - 09:21:17 EST