Re: Post-election statement affirming diversity from Code4Lib?

From: Benjamin Armintor <armintor_at_nyob>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:44:57 -0500
To: CODE4LIB_at_LISTS.CLIR.ORG
+1

On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 4:33 PM, David Mayo <pobocks_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Nov 14, 2016 4:26 PM, "Jason Bengtson" <j.bengtsonunm_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > > On Nov 14, 2016, at 3:14 PM, Katie Montgomery <windcherried_at_GMAIL.COM>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm all for it.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > >
> > > Katie
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Junior Tidal <
> jtidal_at_citytech.cuny.edu>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> I think that's a great idea.
> > >>
> > >> Best,
> > >> Junior
> > >>
> > >>>>> "Kim, Bohyun" <bkim_at_HSHSL.UMARYLAND.EDU> 11/14/16 4:05 PM >>>
> > >> Hi Code4Libbers,
> > >>
> > >> What do you think about issuing a post-election statement on diversity
> > >> basically affirming that we stand by it?
> > >>
> > >> If that _IS_ the majority opinion in Code4Lib which I am _POSITIVE_
> that
> > >> it is, then I want to hear it and I think others may well!
> > >>
> > >> I just drafted one for LITA (to be out tomorrow hopefully). So I have
> > some
> > >> wordings that I can offer as a starting point.
> > >>
> > >> Thoughts?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Bohyun
> > >>
> >
>
Received on Mon Nov 14 2016 - 16:46:01 EST