Spam detection software, running on the system "avery.infomotions.com", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see eric_morgan_at_infomotions.com for details. Content preview: PGP has a dreadful reputation for usability, be prepared for a significant support burden if you take that route. You could always try omitting details from the email but providing a link: "You have 4 books due tomorrow, click here and login to see the details" kind of thing. That in conjunction with a local techie checking your email sending settings. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, -1.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (syeates[at]gmail.com) -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 1.5 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.0 T_HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different 0.0 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is CUSTOM_MED -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.2 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different 0.0 T_FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different
attached mail follows:
PGP has a dreadful reputation for usability, be prepared for a significant support burden if you take that route. You could always try omitting details from the email but providing a link: "You have 4 books due tomorrow, click here and login to see the details" kind of thing. That in conjunction with a local techie checking your email sending settings. cheers stuart -- ...let us be heard from red core to black sky On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Jim Hart <jim_at_jamesahart.us> wrote: > Depending on the client, the default security may be something other than > PGP. Thunderbird comes to mind. I think it uses SSL. Gmail uses TLS. Yahoo! > uses DKIM. Not that PGP can't be added as a plug-in or extension, sometimes > (e.g. Thunderbird), but that may be beyond the capability (and willingness) > of many people. > > I'd love to encrypt some of my email, but haven't been able to get > agreement from even my most savvy acquaintances. > > Let us know how it goes if you decide to tackle it. > > > James A. (Jim) Hart > Board of Trustees > Albert Church Brown Memorial Library > China Village, Maine, USA > > > > On 10/28/2016 06:10 PM, Bigwood, David wrote: > >> I've been thinking about privacy lately. It seems to me much more email >> should be encrypted. Many communications from the library might be personal >> and potentially damaging. Email from the library showing overdues, or holds >> might be sensitive. Would it be possible for our email systems to ask for a >> public PGP key along with email and then use that whenever sending out >> notices? Should my hospital, insurance company, bank, and so on be doing >> the same? Just asking, maybe we could take the lead on privacy in this area. >> >> David Bigwood >> dbigwood_at_hou.usra.edu >> Public PGP Key: http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup? >> op=vindex&search=0x52B602E601695F10 >> Lunar and Planetary institute >> >>Received on Fri Oct 28 2016 - 20:09:24 EDT