Spam detection software, running on the system "avery.infomotions.com", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see eric_morgan_at_infomotions.com for details. Content preview: Depending on the client, the default security may be something other than PGP. Thunderbird comes to mind. I think it uses SSL. Gmail uses TLS. Yahoo! uses DKIM. Not that PGP can't be added as a plug-in or extension, sometimes (e.g. Thunderbird), but that may be beyond the capability (and willingness) of many people. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.4 points, -1.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 1.5 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.0 T_HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different 0.0 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.5 RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM RBL: SORBS: sender is a spam source [74.201.84.163 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000]
attached mail follows:
Depending on the client, the default security may be something other than PGP. Thunderbird comes to mind. I think it uses SSL. Gmail uses TLS. Yahoo! uses DKIM. Not that PGP can't be added as a plug-in or extension, sometimes (e.g. Thunderbird), but that may be beyond the capability (and willingness) of many people. I'd love to encrypt some of my email, but haven't been able to get agreement from even my most savvy acquaintances. Let us know how it goes if you decide to tackle it. James A. (Jim) Hart Board of Trustees Albert Church Brown Memorial Library China Village, Maine, USA On 10/28/2016 06:10 PM, Bigwood, David wrote: > I've been thinking about privacy lately. It seems to me much more email should be encrypted. Many communications from the library might be personal and potentially damaging. Email from the library showing overdues, or holds might be sensitive. Would it be possible for our email systems to ask for a public PGP key along with email and then use that whenever sending out notices? Should my hospital, insurance company, bank, and so on be doing the same? Just asking, maybe we could take the lead on privacy in this area. > > David Bigwood > dbigwood_at_hou.usra.edu > Public PGP Key: http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x52B602E601695F10 > Lunar and Planetary institute >Received on Fri Oct 28 2016 - 19:15:22 EDT