Spam detection software, running on the system "avery.infomotions.com", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see eric_morgan_at_infomotions.com for details. Content preview: Hello, Sounds good. Would be confusing for customers, staff etc. But I support you and say go for it! Will be tough to sell to administration. I would give it a shot. Le me know if you want to bounce ideas off for implementation. Please keep me posted. Your patrons will surely benefit, and I guarantee you will convert many over to encryption. With what's app, messenger, and telegram offering easy to access encryption now. It is more plausible. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, -1.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (corneldardenjr[at]gmail.com) -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 1.5 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.0 T_HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different 0.0 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is CUSTOM_MED -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.2 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different 0.0 T_FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different
attached mail follows:
Hello, Sounds good. Would be confusing for customers, staff etc. But I support you and say go for it! Will be tough to sell to administration. I would give it a shot. Le me know if you want to bounce ideas off for implementation. Please keep me posted. Your patrons will surely benefit, and I guarantee you will convert many over to encryption. With what's app, messenger, and telegram offering easy to access encryption now. It is more plausible. Thanks. Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 28, 2016, at 5:10 PM, Bigwood, David <dbigwood_at_HOU.USRA.EDU> wrote: > > I've been thinking about privacy lately. It seems to me much more email should be encrypted. Many communications from the library might be personal and potentially damaging. Email from the library showing overdues, or holds might be sensitive. Would it be possible for our email systems to ask for a public PGP key along with email and then use that whenever sending out notices? Should my hospital, insurance company, bank, and so on be doing the same? Just asking, maybe we could take the lead on privacy in this area. > > David Bigwood > dbigwood_at_hou.usra.edu > Public PGP Key: http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x52B602E601695F10 > Lunar and Planetary institute >Received on Fri Oct 28 2016 - 18:44:57 EDT