Spam detection software, running on the system "avery.infomotions.com", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see eric_morgan_at_infomotions.com for details. Content preview: Do you need a scanner? Cameras have pretty high resolution these days, are instant capture and if you get a rig with two you can capture an opening with one shot. They're also probably faster to operate unless you are disbinding and using a sheet feeder. [...] Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 1.1 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.7 DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL RBL: Envelope sender listed in dnsbl.ahbl.org [listed in lists.clir.org.rhsbl.ahbl.org. IN] [A] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (andrew.hankinson[at]gmail.com) -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 T_HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different 1.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM RBL: SORBS: sender is a spam source [74.125.82.54 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is CUSTOM_MED -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.0 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different 0.0 T_FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different
attached mail follows:
Do you need a scanner? Cameras have pretty high resolution these days, are instant capture and if you get a rig with two you can capture an opening with one shot. They're also probably faster to operate unless you are disbinding and using a sheet feeder. > On Sep 1, 2016, at 8:40 PM, Matt Sherman <matt.r.sherman_at_GMAIL.COM> wrote: > > Hi all, > > We are doing some digital preservation of our legacy theses and my > boss wanted to get a newer second scanner to move along the project. > As such I was wondering if anyone had suggestions for a good bed or > book scanner that could help make some good quality scans, preferably > ones we could OCR, that doesn't require a lot of space or a darkroom? > I typically have used what my employer already had and as such haven't > had to buy equipment before so I wasn't sure what a decent one would > be. Any suggestions would be welcome. > > Matt ShermanReceived on Thu Sep 01 2016 - 15:52:04 EDT