[SPAM 3.1] Re: [Code4Lib] on hold [not]

From: BWS Johnson <000000031041be12-dmarc-request_at_nyob>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 13:06:29 +0000
To: CODE4LIB_at_LISTS.CLIR.ORG
Spam detection software, running on the system "avery.infomotions.com",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
eric_morgan_at_infomotions.com for details.

Content preview:  Salvete! All Rick roll requests will not work at the olde
  list address, but will at #RNCinCle. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9KtzdP7mR-4&feature=player_embedded>
   [...] 

Content analysis details:   (3.1 points, 1.5 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 2.7 DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL    RBL: Envelope sender listed in dnsbl.ahbl.org
                            [listed in lists.clir.org.rhsbl.ahbl.org.	IN]
                            [A]
 0.0 FROM_LOCAL_DIGITS      From: localpart has long digit sequence
 0.0 FROM_LOCAL_HEX         From: localpart has long hexadecimal sequence
 0.7 FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS  From: starts with several numbers
-0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD        Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain
-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS          SPF: HELO matches SPF record
-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
-1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
                            [score: 0.0000]
 2.1 FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO Freemail in Reply-To, but not From



attached mail follows:


Salvete!

    All Rick roll requests will not work at the olde list address, but will at #RNCinCle.

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9KtzdP7mR-4&feature=player_embedded>

    I admit my problem.

All in good humour,
Brooke


> Eric,
> 
> Thank you as always for your stewardship of the list -- and the smooth
> transition you've facilitated!
> 
> -Jodi
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Stefano Bargioni <bargioni_at_pusc.it> 
> wrote:
> 
>>  Complimenti!
>>  Thx. Stefano
>> 
>>  > On 20 lug 2016, at 16:56, Eric Lease Morgan <emorgan_at_ND.EDU> 
> wrote:
>>  >
>>  > On Jul 20, 2016, at 10:14 AM, Eric Lease Morgan <emorgan_at_nd.edu> 
> wrote:
>>  >
>>  >> With this message I think the Code4Lib mailing list is back 
> online, but
>>  with a different address. Hmmm… Let’s see. —ELM
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > Yes, I believe the mailing list have been successfully moved.
>>  >
>>  > All future postings should be sent to code4lib_at_lists.clir.org. If you
>>  are a fan of LISTSERV commands, then you can address them to
>>  listserv_at_lists.clir.org. The Web interface to the mailing list is
>>  https://lists.clir.org/cgi-bin/wa?A0=CODE4LIB. I have done my best to
>>  update the main menu of http://code4lib.org to reflect this change. I
>>  have also done my best to update some of the email replies sent from the
>>  old LISTSERV implementation, but I’m sure some things will fall through the
>>  cracks.
>>  >
>>  > Huge thanks go out to Wayne Graham at the Digital Library Federation 
> for
>>  the good work he did in bringing up the list at clir.org. “Thank you!"
>>  >
>>  > We now return you to our regularly scheduled programming — all puns
>>  intended.
>>  >
>>  > —
>>  > Eric Lease Morgan
>>  > University of Notre Dame
>>  >
>> 
>
Received on Thu Jul 21 2016 - 09:09:36 EDT