Re: LCSH, Bisac, facets, hierarchy?

From: Debra Shapiro <dsshapiro_at_nyob>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 16:55:35 +0000
To: CODE4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU
> On Apr 13, 2016, at 11:35 AM, Stephen Hearn <s-hear_at_UMN.EDU> wrote:
> 
> as does the
> relative newness of LCGFT terms.


LoC genre form terms have been around since the 1980s; they use to be called gmgpc, and I think were primarily used (correctly!) only by us archival photograph catalogers. It’s the sort of re-branding as LCGFT that’s new.

http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/14099492

gmgpc could be coded in |2 of a MARC 6XX field - https://www.loc.gov/standards/sourcelist/genre-form.html

This is NOT to say that there’s not a huge mishmosh of terms in existing MARC records, that confuse what the item IS with what it’s about, and I’m also NOT arguing for usefulness of MARC coding.

deb
 
dsshapiro_at_wisc.edu
Debra Shapiro
SLIS, the iSchool at UW-Madison
Helen C. White Hall, Rm. 4282
600 N. Park St.
Madison WI 53706
608 262 9195
mobile 608 712 6368
FAX 608 263 4849
Received on Wed Apr 13 2016 - 12:56:04 EDT