Re: separate list for discussing a separate list for jobs

From: Riley Childs <rchilds_at_nyob>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 06:20:35 -0400
To: CODE4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU
+1 ;)

Riley Childs
Student
Asst. Head of IT Services
Charlotte United Christian Academy
(704) 497-2086
RileyChilds.net
Sent from my Windows Phone, please excuse mistakes
________________________________
From: Notess, Mark<mailto:mnotess_at_IU.EDU>
Sent: ý5/ý7/ý2014 12:38 AM
To: CODE4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU<mailto:CODE4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU>
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] separate list for discussing a separate list for jobs

Ha ha---yes! exactly.

On 5/6/14, 6:13 PM, "Joe Hourcle" <oneiros_at_GRACE.NASCOM.NASA.GOV> wrote:

>On May 6, 2014, at 12:34 PM, Dan Chudnov wrote:
>
>> Is it time to reconsider:  should we start a separate list for "Job:"
>>postings?  "code4lib-jobs", perhaps?
>
>I think the real question here is if we should have a separate list for
>discussing if we need a separate list for jobs.  I propose
>'code4lib-jobs-list-discuss'.
>
>-Joe
Received on Wed May 07 2014 - 06:21:21 EDT