Re: EZProxy changes / alternatives ?

From: tmccanna <tmccanna_at_nyob>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 22:10:53 -0500
To: CODE4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Ditto to Andreas.


Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone

<div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Andreas Orphanides <akorphan_at_NCSU.EDU> </div><div>Date:01/28/2014  9:29 PM  (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: CODE4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU </div><div>Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] EZProxy changes / alternatives ? </div><div>
</div>That's simple for the techs, but VPNs can be a royal pain in the keester if
you're an end-user, for a variety of reasons. It should be incumbent on us
as information specialists to unburden the user to the extent possible.


On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Aaron Addison <addison_at_library.umass.edu>wrote:

> Some use Squid, its not hard to set up.  But most vendors publish rules
> with ezproxy in mind.
>
> The other fairly simple solution is to run a VPN for access, and require
> people to use that.
>
> Aaron
>
>
> On Tuesday, January 28, 2014, stuart yeates <stuart.yeates_at_vuw.ac.nz>
> wrote:
>
> > We've just received notification of forth-coming changes to EZProxy,
> which
> > will require us to pay an arm and a leg for future versions to install
> > locally and/or host with OCLC AU with a ~ 10,000km round trip.
> >
> > What are the alternatives?
> >
> > cheers
> > stuart
> > --
> > Stuart Yeates
> > Library Technology Services http://www.victoria.ac.nz/library/
> >
>
Received on Tue Jan 28 2014 - 22:11:23 EST