Regardless of whether or not you enter this, Michael, every vote from the Diebold-o-tron in the t-shirt election will go towards this design.
Mark my words.
-Ross.
On Aug 15, 2012, at 9:16 AM, Doran, Michael D wrote:
>> Second the motion to stop beating this dead horse.
>
>
>
> Dang, and I was already working on this 2013 conference t-shirt design...
>
>
>
> [cid:image001.png_at_01CD7ABE.541F6150]
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>
>> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of
>
>> Friscia, Michael
>
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 7:46 AM
>
>> To: CODE4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU
>
>> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] It's all job postings!
>
>>
>
>> Second the motion to stop beating this dead horse.
>
>>
>
>> ___________________________________________
>
>> Michael Friscia
>
>> Manager, Digital Library & Programming Services
>
>>
>
>> Yale University Library
>
>> (203) 432-1856
>
>>
>
>>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>
>> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU]<mailto:[mailto:CODE4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU]> On Behalf Of
>
>> Carol Bean
>
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 8:43 AM
>
>> To: CODE4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU<mailto:CODE4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU>
>
>> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] It's all job postings!
>
>>
>
>> No.
>
>>
>
>> Just no. Vote taken. Preferences noted. Done.
>
>>
>
>> Carol
>
>>
>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>
>>
>
>> On Aug 15, 2012, at 4:50 AM, Graham Triggs <grahamtriggs_at_GMAIL.COM<mailto:grahamtriggs_at_GMAIL.COM>>
>
>> wrote:
>
>>
>
>>> On 6 August 2012 13:19, Ed Summers <ehs_at_pobox.com<mailto:ehs_at_pobox.com>> wrote:
>
>>>> 150 people responded about whether jobs.code4lib.org posting should
>
>>>> come to the discussion list:
>
>>>>
>
>>>> yes: 132
>
>>>> no: 10
>
>>>> who cares: 8
>
>>>>
>
>>>> 93% in support or agnostic seems to be a good indicator that the
>
>>>> postings should continue to come to the list for now.
>
>>>
>
>>> I'm not entirely convinced about that assessment. I quite readily
>
>>> agree that the jobs should be posted to *a* mailing list, I'm not so
>
>>> sure that it should be this mailing list.
>
>>>
>
>>> It's been discussed about filtering the jobs sent to the list, but I
>
>>> already filter the code4lib mailing list into a tag. It's been a bit
>
>>> of a faff, but I've subdivided the filtering so that I can get the
>
>>> messages sent from jobs@... to go to a different tag. But then Ed
>
>>> replied to one, so now it appears in both tags, and because I'm using
>
>>> Gmail, it takes the whole thread with it.
>
>>>
>
>>> So filtering really isn't a solution.
>
>>>
>
>>> Rather than just asking whether jobs should come to this mailing list,
>
>>> maybe we can ask whether a separate mailing list should be set up,
>
>>> specifically for jobs. The two mailing lists could be cross promoted
>
>>> (e.g. a standard footer), and people can choose whether they want or
>
>>> don't want to receive them. And we can still have
>
>>> discussions/follow-ups about those jobs on that mailing list.
>
>>>
>
>>> Even though the vast majority of the postings aren't applicable to me,
>
>>> I would probably still sign up to a separate jobs mailing list as it
>
>>> is of interest - but I would at least then be able to keep that
>
>>> separate from the main discussions, which is something I can't
>
>>> effectively do right now.
>
>>>
>
>>> G
Received on Wed Aug 15 2012 - 09:42:33 EDT