Re: Leader in MarcXML Files ( Record Length )

From: Kyle Banerjee <banerjek_at_nyob>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 10:26:47 -0700
To: CODE4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Reese, Terry
<terry.reese_at_oregonstate.edu>wrote:

> I wouldn't.  One of the benefits of marcxml is that you are not
> constrained by marcs record length issues.  Deciding to calculate that
> value would add an arbitrary length limitation to the format (in my
> opinion).
>

Not to mention that the value includes the length added by the internal
index. The internal index is not represented in MARCXML and constitutes a
substantial portion of the total record length when there are a large
number of fields.  If someone has actually implemented a system that uses
this value, the designers can be dismissed as being completely mental.

kyle
Received on Fri Jun 29 2012 - 13:27:23 EDT