We cried our eyes out in 1976 when this first came to our attention at the BL. Even more crying when we couldn't get rid of it in the MARC-I to MARC-II conversion (well before MARC21 was even a twinkle) - a lot of tears are gathering somewhere.
Peter
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Bill Dueber
> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 5:50 PM
> To: CODE4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] more on MARC char encoding: Now we're about ISO_2709 and MARC21
>
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Simon Spero <sesuncedu_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Actually Anglo and Francophone centric. And the USMARC style 245 was a
> > poor replacement for the UKMARC approach (someone at the British
> > Library hosted Linked Data meeting wondered why there were punctation
> > characters included in the data in the title field. The catalogers wept slightly).
> >
> > Simon
> >
>
>
> Slightly? I cry my eyes out *every single day* about that. Well, every weekday, anyway.
>
>
> --
> Bill Dueber
> Library Systems Programmer
> University of Michigan Library
Received on Wed Apr 18 2012 - 09:41:31 EDT