Re: more on MARC char encoding: Now we're about ISO_2709 and MARC21

From: Bill Dueber <bill_at_nyob>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 20:50:08 -0400
To: CODE4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Simon Spero <sesuncedu_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Actually Anglo and Francophone centric. And the USMARC style 245 was a poor
> replacement for the UKMARC approach (someone at the British Library hosted
> Linked Data meeting wondered why there were punctation characters included
> in the data in the title field. The catalogers wept slightly).
>
> Simon
>


Slightly? I cry my eyes out *every single day* about that. Well, every
weekday, anyway.


-- 
Bill Dueber
Library Systems Programmer
University of Michigan Library
Received on Tue Apr 17 2012 - 20:51:25 EDT