Re: NEcode4lib?

From: Jay Luker <lbjay_at_nyob>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 10:55:15 -0500
To: CODE4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU
+1. Keep it on the main list.

--jay

On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Kevin S. Clarke <ksclarke_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> But I think in the past people on this list have said they don't mind
> the additional traffic from people planning regional stuff.  It's
> useful to keep it on the main list, too, because the other regions can
> learn from the chatter (what works, what doesn't, etc.)
>
> Kevin
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Ranti Junus <ranti.junus_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> Google Group works for planning code4lib regional-related stuff.
>>
>> On Dec 18, 2011 10:31 AM, "Tito Sierra" <tjsierra_at_mit.edu> wrote:
>>> What's the best way of organizing a code4lib regional without clogging the
>>> list?  Google group?
Received on Mon Dec 19 2011 - 10:57:13 EST