On Dec 6, 2011, at 5:52 PM, Montoya, Gabriela wrote:
> ...
> I'd much rather see resources invested in data synching than spending it in saving text dumps that will most likely not be referred to again.
> ...
In a MARC-as-the-record-of-record scenario; storing the original raw MARC might be helpful for the syncing -- when a "sync" was happing, the new MARC of record could maybe be compared against the old MARC of record to know that RDF triples needed to be updated?
Received on Tue Dec 06 2011 - 21:01:23 EST