I disagree that the voting procedure is flawed. I voted 12 times, which seems downright generous.
Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Kevin S. Clarke
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 2:00 PM
To: CODE4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Pandering for votes for code4lib sessions (humor)
Great... now this song is stuck in my head. ;-)
Nicely done, though...
Kevin
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Doran, Michael D <doran_at_uta.edu> wrote:
>> I feel this whole situation has tainted things somewhat. :(
>
> This incident appears to have been blown out of proportion.
>
> So to lighten the mood a bit, I offer this doggerel inspired by the above comment and with apologies to Ed Cobb, et al.:
>
> Tainted Votes
>
> Sometimes I feel I've got to
> Run away I've got to
> Get away
> From the stain you cause with all this pandering
> The votes were cast
> Now my session's last
> We can make this right
> If the splash page is up by tonight
>
> Once I ran to you (I ran)
> Now I'll run from you
> The tainted votes have riven
> All the results diebold had scriven
> Take my jeers and that's not nearly all
> Oh...tainted votes
> Tainted votes
>
> -- Michael
Received on Thu Dec 01 2011 - 17:53:03 EST