Re: Unwritten Rules, formerly Pandering for votes for code4lib sessions

From: Genny Engel <gengel_at_nyob>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 20:56:33 +0000
To: CODE4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Can't.  The first rule of unwritten rules is ...

Genny 


-----Original Message-----
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Wilfred Drew
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 12:51 PM
To: CODE4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Unwritten Rules, formerly Pandering for votes for code4lib sessions

If it is that important, it should be written down!

-----Original Message-----
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Chris Cormack
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 3:36 PM
To: CODE4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Unwritten Rules, formerly Pandering for votes for code4lib sessions

On 2 December 2011 09:33, Munson, Doris <dmunson_at_ewu.edu> wrote:
> As a relative newcomer to this list, I second the idea that any offenders be contacted off list with an explanation of any unwritten rules they unknowingly violate.  I suggest this becomes one of c4l's unwritten rules.
>
>
I totally just unwrote that down

Chris
Received on Thu Dec 01 2011 - 15:59:05 EST