> I think Roy's question was fair given the ambiguity of the words
> used and had it truly meant to "develop" (as from the ground up)
> it could have served as a good conversation starting point about
> how to determine the need and merits of starting another major
> project with what appeared to be very limited resources.
> Especially when there are many tools readily available from other
> sources/projects.
>
> But the clarification has been issued and the response that new
> wording is likely to be used in subsequent communications.
>
> Let's accept that and move on.
I concur. Let's accept that and move on.
--
Eric Lease Morgan
Received on Tue Sep 27 2011 - 14:45:09 EDT