Jon and Karen are correct. LC doesn't map/convert local fields because usage varies.
Tracy
Tracy Meehleib
Network Development and MARC Standards Office
Library of Congress
101 Independence Ave SE
Washington, DC 20540-4402
+1 202 707 0121 (voice)
+1 202 707 0115 (fax)
tmee_at_loc.gov
-----Original Message-----
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Karen Miller
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 12:35 PM
To: CODE4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] MARCXML to MODS: 590 Field
Joel,
The 590 is indeed defined for local use, so whatever your local institution uses it for should guide your mapping to MODS. There are some examples of what it's used for on the OCLC Bibliographic Formats and Standards pages:
http://www.oclc.org/bibformats/en/5xx/590.shtm
Frequently it's used as a note that is specific to a local copy of an item.
If your institution uses it inconsistently, you might want to just map it to mods:note.
Karen
Karen D. Miller
Monographic/Digital Projects Cataloger
Bibliographic Services Dept.
Northwestern University Library
Evanston, IL
k-miller3_at_northwestern.edu
847-467-3462
-----Original Message-----
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Jon
Stroop
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 11:07 AM
To: CODE4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] MARCXML to MODS: 590 Field
I'm going to guess that it's because 59x fields are defined for local use:
http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd59x.html
...but someone from LC should be able to confirm.
-Jon
--
Jon Stroop
Metadata Analyst
Firestone Library
Princeton University
Princeton, NJ 08544
Email: jstroop_at_princeton.edu
Phone: (609)258-0059
Fax: (609)258-0441
http://pudl.princeton.edu
http://diglib.princeton.edu
http://diglib.princeton.edu/ead
http://www.cpanda.org/cpanda
On 05/19/2011 11:45 AM, Richard, Joel M wrote:
> Dear hive-mind,
>
> Does anyone know why the Library of Congress-supplied MARCXML to MODS XSLT
[1] does not handle the MARC 590 Local Notes field? It seems to handle
everything else, not that I've done an exhaustive search... :)
>
> Granted, I could copy/create my own XSLT and add this functionality in
myself, but I'm curious as to whether or not there's some logic behind this
decision to not include it. Logic that I would not naturally understand
since I'm not formally trained as a librarian.
>
> Thanks!
> --Joel
>
> [1] http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/MARC21slim2MODS3-4.xsl
>
>
> Joel Richard
> IT Specialist, Web Services Department
> Smithsonian Institution Libraries | http://www.sil.si.edu/
> (202) 633-1706 | richardjm_at_si.edu
Received on Thu May 19 2011 - 14:19:37 EDT