Ralph, Owen's pointing to a list where corporate (110) and geographic names
(151) are mixed.
Thanks Owen, I haven't seen that the first time. I guess you got that mixed
110/151 when limiting to 'exact name'. Perhaps Andrew has a workaround.
*Ya'aqov*
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:34 AM, LeVan,Ralph <levan_at_oclc.org> wrote:
> If you look at the fields those names come from, I think they mean
> England as a corporation, not England as a place.
>
> Ralph
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf
> Of
> > Owen Stephens
> > Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 11:28 AM
> > To: CODE4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU
> > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] LCSH and Linked Data
> >
> > Still digesting Andrew's response (thanks Andrew), but
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Ya'aqov Ziso <yaaqovz_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > *Currently under id.loc.gov you will not find name authority
> records, but
> > > you can find them at viaf.org*.
> > > *[YZ]* viaf.org does not include geographic names. I just checked
> there
> > > England.
> > >
> >
> > Is this not the relevant VIAF entry
> > http://viaf.org/viaf/14299580<http://viaf.org/viaf/142995804>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Owen Stephens
> > Owen Stephens Consulting
> > Web: http://www.ostephens.com
> > Email: owen_at_ostephens.com
>
--
*ya'aqov**ZISO | **yaaqovz_at_gmail.com **| 856 217 3456
*
Received on Thu Apr 07 2011 - 11:57:48 EDT