Re: LCSH and Linked Data

From: Ford, Kevin <kefo_at_nyob>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 11:44:52 -0400
To: CODE4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Actually, it appears to depend on whose Authority record you're looking at.  The Canadians, Australians, and Israelis have it as a CorporateName (110), as do the French (210 - unimarc); LC and the Germans say it's a Geographic Name.

In the case of LCSH, therefore, it would be a 151.  Regardless, it is in VIAF.

Warmly,

Kevin



________________________________________
From: Code for Libraries [CODE4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of LeVan,Ralph [levan_at_OCLC.ORG]
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 11:34
To: CODE4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] LCSH and Linked Data

If you look at the fields those names come from, I think they mean
England as a corporation, not England as a place.

Ralph

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf
Of
> Owen Stephens
> Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 11:28 AM
> To: CODE4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] LCSH and Linked Data
>
> Still digesting Andrew's response (thanks Andrew), but
>
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Ya'aqov Ziso <yaaqovz_at_gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> > *Currently under id.loc.gov you will not find name authority
records, but
> > you can find them at viaf.org*.
> > *[YZ]*  viaf.org does not include geographic names. I just checked
there
> > England.
> >
>
> Is this not the relevant VIAF entry
> http://viaf.org/viaf/14299580<http://viaf.org/viaf/142995804>
>
>
> --
> Owen Stephens
> Owen Stephens Consulting
> Web: http://www.ostephens.com
> Email: owen_at_ostephens.com
Received on Thu Apr 07 2011 - 11:51:33 EDT