I think the constraint is that it has to be a rational number.
-----Original Message-----
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Eric
Hellman
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 5:58 PM
To: CODE4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] mailing list administratativia
I vote for changing the limit threshold to
PI * (eventual length of this meta-thread).
On Oct 27, 2010, at 3:37 PM, Alexander Johannesen wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:44 AM, Doran, Michael D <doran_at_uta.edu> wrote:
>> Can that limit threshold be raised? If so, are there reasons why it
should not be raised?
>
> Is it to throttle spam or something? 50 seems rather low, and it's
> rather depressing to have a lively discussion throttled like that. Not
> to mention I thought I was simply kicked out for living things up
> (especially given my reasonable follow-up was where the throttling
> began).
>
> Alex
> --
> Project Wrangler, SOA, Information Alchemist, UX, RESTafarian, Topic
> Maps
> --- http://shelter.nu/blog/
> ----------------------------------------------
> ------------------ http://www.google.com/profiles/alexander.johannesen
> ---
Eric Hellman
President, Gluejar, Inc.
41 Watchung Plaza, #132
Montclair, NJ 07042
USA
eric_at_hellman.net
http://go-to-hellman.blogspot.com/
@gluejar
Received on Wed Oct 27 2010 - 18:19:04 EDT