Alexander Johannesen wrote: > > Is it to throttle spam or something? 50 seems rather low, and it's > rather depressing to have a lively discussion throttled like that. Not > > Pretty sure it wasn't depressing to the vast majority of the listserv audience. That was/is a discussion that benefited from a "timeout period", like you give the pre-schoolers.Received on Wed Oct 27 2010 - 15:55:14 EDT