Re: Next-generation policy for WorldCat records?open for community review

From: Karen Coyle <lists_at_nyob>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 06:53:32 -0700
To: CODE4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Quoting Tim Spalding <tim_at_LIBRARYTHING.COM>:

> Does anyone know:
>
> Is there a "what is a WorldCat record" section? I can't find it. Does
> the "original cataloger" concept still apply, or has that gone away?
>
> Tim
>

Tim, I asked this of one of the authors, and he said he'd take it back  
to the group. I think there does need to be a definition. (Also note  
that if you looked at the document yesterday morning, it had changed  
by the afternoon -- there had been a couple of missing paragraphs...  
so take another look.)

My question about WorldCat records has to do with whole v. parts -- I  
can understand that a full MARC record, with holdings, downloaded from  
WC could be considered a WC record. After that, there is a lot of  
distance between the full MARC and, say, a citation with an author,  
title, publisher and date. Where is the line drawn? When does it cease  
to be a WC record and become just another chunk of bibliographic data  
floating around cyberspace?

kc

-- 
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
ph: 1-510-540-7596
m: 1-510-435-8234  
begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              1-510-435-8234      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
skype: kcoylenet
Received on Thu Apr 08 2010 - 09:54:21 EDT