Re: resolution and identification (was Re: registering info: uris?)

From: Roy Tennant <tennantr_at_nyob>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 08:31:14 -0700
To: CODE4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Uh, before this gets completely out of hand, UC is still running a PURL
server, see for example:

<http://purl.uclibs.org/maint/display.pl.cgi?noedit=on&purl=/PID/16551&id=no
body>

Roy

On 4/2/09 4/2/09 € 8:07 AM, "Mike Taylor" <mike_at_INDEXDATA.COM> wrote:

> Karen Coyle writes:
>>> OK, good, then if you are concerned about the PURL services SPOF,
>>> take the freely available PURL software and created a distributed
>>> PURL based system and put it up for the community.  I think
>>> several people have looked at this, but I have not heard of any
>>> progress or implementations.
>> 
>> The California Digital Library ran the PURL software for a while,
>> using it to mint identifiers for digital documents. It was a while
>> back, but someone there may remember how it went.
> 
> Wait, what?  They _were_ running a PURL resolver, but now they're not?
> What does the P in PURL stand for again?
> 
>  _/|_  ___________________________________________________________________
> /o ) \/  Mike Taylor    <mike@indexdata.com>    http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
> )_v__/\  "Wagner's music is nowhere near as bad as it sounds" -- Mark
> Twain.
> 

-- 
Received on Thu Apr 02 2009 - 11:33:24 EDT