Re: resolution and identification (was Re: registering info: uris?)

From: Mike Taylor <mike_at_nyob>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 15:07:08 +0100
To: CODE4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Houghton,Andrew writes:
 > > I have to say I am suspicious of schemes like PURL, which for all
 > > their good points introduce a single point of failure into, well,
 > > everything that uses them.  That can't be good.  Especially as
 > > it's run by the same compary that also runs the often-unavailable
 > > OpenURL registry.
 > 
 > What you are saying is that you are suspicious of the HTTP protocol.

That is NOT what I am saying.

I am saying I am suspicious of a single point of failure.  Especially
since the entire architecture of the Internet was (rightly IMHO)
designed with the goal of avoid SPOFs.

 _/|_	 ___________________________________________________________________
/o ) \/  Mike Taylor    <mike@indexdata.com>    http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\  "In My Egotistical Opinion, most people's C programs should
	 be indented six feet downward and covered with dirt" -- Blair
	 P. Houghton.
Received on Thu Apr 02 2009 - 10:09:21 EDT