I've got nothing against putting http uris in OpenURLs myself. I don't
understand the objection to that, really.
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't the point of all this to be able to put
> the URI in an OpenURL? And info was invented (in part) to avoid putting
> http URIs in OpenURLs (because they are complicated enough already, why
> clutter them further). So I don't see that pursuing an http solution to
> this is very useful. --Ray
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Houghton,Andrew" <houghtoa_at_OCLC.ORG>
> To: <CODE4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU>
> Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 5:24 PM
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris?
>
>
>
>>> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of
>>> Jonathan Rochkind
>>> Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 5:18 PM
>>> To: CODE4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU
>>> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris?
>>>
>>> I am not interested in maintaining a sudoc.info registration, and
>>> neither is my institution, who I wouldn't trust to maintain it (even to
>>> the extent of not letting the DNS registration expire) after I left.
>>>
>> BTW, you could always use http://purl.org/ and later if you wanted
>> to have it resolve to something just change the PURL.
>>
Received on Fri Mar 27 2009 - 18:11:02 EDT