On Feb 15, 2005, at 10:57 AM, Hickey,Thom wrote:
> It seems to me that your version -would- be possible to generate from a
> MARC record.
Perhaps, but I would want to see:
* The title as it was printed on the book, not this lowercase business
* No "[electronic resource]" title field foolishness
* No mixing of author/editor and the title as we presently do in the
245 field for some reason I still can't figure out
We have more anachronistic practices in our catalogs than I think we
fully appreciate.
Roy
Received on Fri Feb 18 2005 - 13:39:52 EST