Marshall, 'Bakkhai/Euripides: Translation and Commentary', Bryn Mawr Classical Review 9601
URL = http://hegel.lib.ncsu.edu/stacks/serials/bmcr/bmcr-9601-marshall-bakkhaieuripides

@@@@96.1.10, Meagher, Bakkhai/Euripides

Robert Emmet Meagher, <i>Bakkhai/Euripides: Translation and
Commentary</i>. Wauconda, IL: Bolchazy-Carducci Publishers, 1995.
Pp. vi + 97. $6.00. ISBN 0-86516-285-9.
  Reviewed by C.W. Marshall -- Trent University
     cmarshall@trentu.ca

"The definitive aim of this translation has been to provide a
playable script," Meagher assures us in his preface (iv), which
is as it should be.  While ultimately it is as a stage piece that
the translation must be judged, the reader has cause for
misgiving before the preface is complete.  "Both modern audiences
and modern dancers, for different reasons, often find the
continuous presence of the Chorus on stage to be problematic"
(v):  Meagher's riposte is to substitute his own truncated Choral
odes, "radically abridged ... suitable ... to the needs of
contemporary composers and choreographers" (v) in an appendix at
the back (91-97).  While the Chorus is translated at length in
the text, it is implied that a playable script needs Meagher's
substitutes, since those of Euripides are, "for our purposes,
mostly too long and unwieldy" (v).  His self-identified "zealous"
(v) caution with the text--deleting only 2% of the whole, "for a
complex of reasons" (v)--rings hollow as a result.  If the
calculations include the Chorus, the amount of adapted text leaps
to over 23%, and this is no longer Euripides.

The passages Meagher admits he deletes are also telling. Lines
286-97 are supported in their authenticity by Pap. Oxy. 3718.
Lines 1330-1339, mysteriously predicting the metamorphosis of
Kadmos and Harmonia into snakes, are replaced with the flat "I
have plans for you, demands to make. / Your way will be hard"
(64).  Certainly deletion removes a problem from the play.  These
lines tease the imagination of an interpreter of <i>Bakkhai</i>,
urging a decision as to what has been lost in the lacuna.  But
Meagher does not like to be teased.  Nine other lines are removed
from the epilogue (1354-1360, 1371-1372), all similarly
unfounded.  (At any rate, the translation itself lacks any line
numbers, so the information is of use only to Greek scholars.)

Similarly disappointing is the "Commentary" (69-90), a rambling,
allusive discussion of some of the play's themes.  <i>Bakkhai</i>
is identified as a "'Poetics' of Euripides" (70), bequeathed by
the author to the world at the end of his career. This is an
arguable case, but not one that can be made in isolation from
<i>Iphigeneia in Aulis</i>, which Meagher has translated
elsewhere. Making a case is not his concern, however.  The
commentary discusses notions of fluids, illusion, masks,
mortality, and vision.  The discussion of masks (77-79) in
particular is out of place, as Meagher had earlier claimed (iv)
that conventions such as masked acting also need translation,
which--for him--is to say removal from a modern production.

Some of Meagher's observations are interesting, but these are
afloat in an insubstantial sea of vague style, which at times is
mantically terse:  "The reveler's cup is shallow" (74);
"Revelation is a process" (80).  The extended and repeated use of
apposition wears thin:  "Like him [Pentheus], we are willing,
even anxious, to stare into the chaos at the core of things,
provided we may do so from a safe distance, untouched,
untouchable" (81) is a representative example.  Even the most
basic details are missing (e.g. production date) which mean that
the book would need to be supplemented if used as a classroom
text.  There is no hint of bibliography, save a glancing
acknowledgement to Dodds' commentary. Nevertheless, some
knowledge of Euripides and Attic tragedy is clearly being
assumed.

The translation of the episodes consistently maintains a tone
that is modern and idiomatic.  Trimeters are put into free verse,
and the slangy roll of some speeches is at times appealing.  As
with any translation, there are bound to be points of
dissatisfaction.  Some words are over-translated (Dionysus is
"the boy-child of Zeus" in line 1 [1]) and some are not
translated at all.  There are also several times when Meagher
feels Euripides has not said enough.  In general, though, the
speeches in the episodes can be pronounced on a stage.  Here are
lines 918-922, spoken by Pentheus (44):

I see what seem to be two suns and two Thebes,
 two cities, each with seven gates.
And you, my leader and guide,
 have sprouted horns from your head.
You look to me like a bull.
Were you wild from the beginning?
You are wild now.  Your savage leering eyes leave no doubts.
You are a wild bull.

These are not words for an actor to savour, on a large bare
stage. They are not grand; the scale is too small.

Even with his expressed goal, Meagher's offering does not provide
much.  As a playable script, it offers a very soft Euripides,
lacking the bite of problem passages, the solid foundation of a
majestic chorus, and the religious austerity of deity incarnate. 
The difficulties posed by production of <i>Bakkhai</i> are
largely erased from this translation, as if they had never been. 
Meagher's Euripides may sound modern, but he is no longer Greek.